that sounds like a bug. if child1 is not visible then the entire
enclosure should not be visible.
-igor
On 10/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another idea for RFE:
Also I've noticed that when wicket:enclosure does not change the visibility
of ALL its child components (only the specified one), this causes unexpected
results.
Example:
wicket:enclosure child='child1'
div wicket:id=child1/div
div wicket:id=child2/div
/wicket:enclosure
In this case, I would expect that if the child1 is not visible, also child2
would not be visible. Unfortunately the actual behavior exactly opposite:
child1 is not visible, while child2 is visible.
Alex Objelean wrote:
Currently, wicket does not support nested wicket:enclosure tags. It would
be very useful. What do you think?
Thank you!
Alex.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--Nested-wicket%3Aenclosure-tf4593044.html#a13131316
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
