Re: Ajaxifying existing application
It´s not as if I have a choice, whether this requirement should be implemented or not:(... I´m not a big ajax fan, i like the application the way it is today, but ajax is hype today, and every customer wants more of it... -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Ajaxifying-existing-application-tp3486615p3489746.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Ajaxifying existing application
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:36 PM, splitshade wrote: > Hi, > > i have a general question, > we have an exisiting application, that now needs to be ajaxified (no page > reloads etc..). > This has never been a requirement, so the application is not prepared at all > for this. > So, why is this a requirement now? If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Why does it *have* to be "ajaxified"? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Ajaxifying existing application
Use ajax with responsibility. To much ajax can make bad things :]. I can not undestand, why you would like to change page to panel, and rerender it all, just like setResponcePage does. Try to sit and decide, which parts of page should be ajaxified and which should be left as it is.-- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Ajaxifying-existing-application-tp3486615p3488474.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Ajaxifying existing application
Hi James, yes, thats exaclty what I meant. The Problem is, we have an existing infrastructure, that depends on pages. The idea to change everything to a "setResponsePanel"-Method seems to be very good, I think we could realize that very cheaply, thanks for the hint! Would that be something that could be of interest for the framework itself? Would it be possible/reasonable to integrate that into an AbstractAjaxWebPage or something? I did not try this out, but it seems to be a good idea that could be of interest to many people? Regards Martin -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Ajaxifying-existing-application-tp3486615p3488304.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Ajaxifying existing application
if all your pages extend a base page then you can change the base page to extend a panel instead. than s/setResponsePage/setResponsePanel/ create a page that has the necessary infra to swap content panels and wire in the new setResponsePanel to use that. -igor On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 2:36 PM, splitshade wrote: > Hi, > > i have a general question, > we have an exisiting application, that now needs to be ajaxified (no page > reloads etc..). > This has never been a requirement, so the application is not prepared at all > for this. > > The biggest problem we see is that we have many different pages, but how > shall we do page switches using ajax? > > I look forward to any hints on this. > > Thank you very much.-- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Ajaxifying-existing-application-tp3486615p3486615.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Ajaxifying existing application
I think he meant that rather than using a page-oriented design, that they'd need to switch to more of a one page, switch panels design? On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:09 AM, meduolis wrote: > Why do you want to switch page using ajax? :D If you redownload all page > contents, do not use ajax :), it only complicates everything. Use ajax, when > you want to refresh only some of page components, like table, other > containers-- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Ajaxifying-existing-application-tp3486615p3487445.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Ajaxifying existing application
Why do you want to switch page using ajax? :D If you redownload all page contents, do not use ajax :), it only complicates everything. Use ajax, when you want to refresh only some of page components, like table, other containers-- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Ajaxifying-existing-application-tp3486615p3487445.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Ajaxifying existing application
Hi, i have a general question, we have an exisiting application, that now needs to be ajaxified (no page reloads etc..). This has never been a requirement, so the application is not prepared at all for this. The biggest problem we see is that we have many different pages, but how shall we do page switches using ajax? I look forward to any hints on this. Thank you very much.-- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Ajaxifying-existing-application-tp3486615p3486615.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org