Martin Grigorov-4 wrote:
Both Wiquery and jqWicket provide integration with JQuery UI, not plain
JQuery.
Wicket core may provide some abstractions to make integrations with
JQuery UI at some later point.
JQWicket provides much more than only JQuery UI integration.
It delivers a
Hey ..
I've had a hope someone else allready did it .. so that's why I asked.
Regards
Armando
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/jqWicket-or-wiQuery-tp3895432p3897026.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
of jQuery and not intending to expose the entire jQuery API?
-Original Message-
From: armandoxxx [mailto:armando@dropchop.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2011 6:11 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: jqWicket or wiQuery
Hey ..
I've had a hope someone else allready did
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: jqWicket or wiQuery
Hey ..
I've had a hope someone else allready did it .. so that's why I asked.
Regards
Armando
--
View this message in context: http://apache-
wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/jqWicket-or-wiQuery-tp3895432p3897026.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list
Why don't you implement your use case with both projects and decide which
one was easier/better?
*Bruno Borges*
(21) 7672-7099
*www.brunoborges.com*
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:04 PM, armandoxxx armando@dropchop.comwrote:
hey guys need your opinion which you preffer ... I've checked both
