RE: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-06-17 Thread Joachim F. Kainz
@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket and mobile browsers Thank you for the hint, mobileaware wasn't on my radar so far. 2010/6/15 Joachim F. Kainz j...@jolira.com Martin, WURFL is a great solution, but there are some problems with keeping it up-to-date for commercial applications. http

Re: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-06-16 Thread Martin Funk
Thank you for the hint, mobileaware wasn't on my radar so far. 2010/6/15 Joachim F. Kainz j...@jolira.com Martin, WURFL is a great solution, but there are some problems with keeping it up-to-date for commercial applications. http://www.mobileaware.com/ is a good commercial vendor I have

RE: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-06-16 Thread Chris Colman
: Martin Funk [mailto:mafulaf...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 7:10 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket and mobile browsers Thank you for the hint, mobileaware wasn't on my radar so far. 2010/6/15 Joachim F. Kainz j...@jolira.com Martin, WURFL is a great solution

RE: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-06-16 Thread Chris Colman
) but I can never get any parts of our wicket website that require AJAX to work on this phone. Any idea why not? -Original Message- From: Martin Funk [mailto:mafulaf...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2010 7:10 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket and mobile browsers

Re: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-06-15 Thread Joachim F. Kainz
Giovanni, I am one of the developers of mobile.walmart.com. We are using Wicket to support all types of cell phones, but most of our traffic is from smart phones. If you point to our site using iPhone, Blackberry, and Motorola Razor you get three different experience. All three experiences are

Re: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-06-15 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Joachim F. Kainz j...@jolira.com wrote: We have nothing to do with visural wicket Oops - my bad. Jolira / Visural - all the names jumble in my head after a while. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com

Re: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-06-15 Thread Martin Funk
Hi Giovanni, on what basis do you do the device recognition and classification? Currently we are looking into wurfl http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/ Any opion on tha? Or do you know of an alternative to wurfl? mf 2010/6/15 Joachim F. Kainz j...@jolira.com Giovanni, I am one of the developers

Re: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-06-15 Thread Joachim F. Kainz
Martin, WURFL is a great solution, but there are some problems with keeping it up-to-date for commercial applications. http://www.mobileaware.com/ is a good commercial vendor I have used for m.wellsfarg.com and other sites. They have an extensive device-repository and a lot of other useful

Re: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-04-18 Thread Ngoc Dao
I think there browsers that do not support: * cookie - not a problem because servlet containers solve this problem * JS - Ajax does not work * Complex CSS - UI should be simple, mobile screens are not big anyway Ngoc On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Giovanni pino_o...@yahoo.com wrote: I need

Re: Wicket and mobile browsers

2010-04-18 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
There are many classes of smart phones available. Some support n JS, some very limited, while others support just about anything you can put in a regular browser. Because of this, you may use the same java code with three or four different styles of markup so that each browser class has its own