device
-Original Message-
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 10:17 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicketstuff Core Dependency Management...
Wicket itself doesn't declare the dependencies this way. So, why
should wicketstuff-core
I'm no Maven expert, but I believe we ended up doing it that way because it
allowed subprojects to override those dependencies. I think if your subproject
specifically needs it, you simply add it as a dependency to your pom and change
it to required. You don't have to define a version - that
Well, it does break some things and I plan on fixing those. The
problem with dictating the provided scope in the parent is that it
totally screws up the transitive dependencies. So, in my example
(which was generated from a quickstart), I've got slf4j-log4j declared
as a dependency. But, since
Actually that might mess up the rest of us :)
If you need those lobs to be includes, simply add them to you pom and
change their scope so they are included... The build should then
override the provided scope in the parent.
- Brill Pappin
Sent from my mobile.
On 21-Mar-09, at 9:01 AM,
But, I shouldn't *have* to do that, Brill. That's the whole point.
Breaking transitive dependency resolution is a bad thing in the maven
world. We're handing dependencies the wrong way if we're breaking
stuff.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Brill Pappin br...@pappin.ca wrote:
Actually that
Wicket itself doesn't declare the dependencies this way. So, why
should wicketstuff-core?
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:11 AM, James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
But, I shouldn't *have* to do that, Brill. That's the whole point.
Breaking transitive dependency resolution is a bad
I thought you were talking about the the jetty dependencies (which I
think slf4j is part of)?
If they are not marked as provided, then won't everyone have to
override them in order to exclude them?
- Brill
On 21-Mar-09, at 11:11 AM, James Carman wrote:
But, I shouldn't *have* to do that,
://www.wickettraining.com
-- sent from a wireless device
-Original Message-
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 10:17 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicketstuff Core Dependency Management...
Wicket itself doesn't declare
)
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
-- sent from a wireless device
-Original Message-
From: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 10:17 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicketstuff Core Dependency Management...
Wicket itself
