Thanks! That is what I needed to know.
On 10/20/2012 06:10 AM, Sebastien wrote:
+1, perfectly explained IMHO. Migrating from 1.4 to 6 directly is much more
complicated than performing the migration in 2 steps and much more error
prone.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Chris Colman
wrote:
I w
+1, perfectly explained IMHO. Migrating from 1.4 to 6 directly is much more
complicated than performing the migration in 2 steps and much more error
prone.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Chris Colman
wrote:
> >I would say "no" only because going from 1.5 -> 6 was super easy. I
> >changed a few
>I would say "no" only because going from 1.5 -> 6 was super easy. I
>changed a few ints to longs, added a bunch of type parameters for
>sorting and then it all "just worked".
While I found 1.5 -> 6 a lot easier than 1.4 -> 1.5 if you like
incremental development and want to have some intermediate
I would say "no" only because going from 1.5 -> 6 was super easy. I
changed a few ints to longs, added a bunch of type parameters for
sorting and then it all "just worked".
Bill-
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Jered Myers
wrote:
> I am working on migrating a large application from Wicket 1.4.1
I am working on migrating a large application from Wicket 1.4.18 to
Wicket 6.x. Is it better to convert to 1.5 first and then to 6.x or to
just go straight to 6.x? Thanks. Also, an early thanks to everybody
who took the time to write the migration guides!
Jered
---
