I have not been in the industry as long as some here, nor have I worked on as
many projects, etc, but I have been a long time user of software, and well
as written my own.
The way I see things are (Major Revision).(Minor Revision).(Fix) there are
sometimes different schema perhaps for daily build
Hi,
Just want to share my thought, I've worked for 15 years in the software
domain, and I'm used to release numbers.
For me, a 3.0 release is not stable.
Have a nice day.
Maxime
2010/11/4 Ludovic Dubost
> Le 03/11/10 09:57, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
> > On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU
Le 03/11/10 09:57, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
> On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
>> I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
>> And i am +1 on the content vincent propose
>>
>> But my point of view is -1 steppi
[Ricardo Rodriguez] eBioTIC. wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
>>> I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
>>> And i am +1 on the content vinc
Hi!
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
>> I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
>> And i am +1 on the content vincent propose
>>
>> But my point of view is -1 stepping the relea
On 11/01/2010 12:50 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
> I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
> And i am +1 on the content vincent propose
>
> But my point of view is -1 stepping the release family number because the
> main purpo
