[USMA:49526] Sudan over the 'Imperial' Hill

2011-01-15 Thread a-bruiexjr
http://allafrica.com/stories/201101130960.html Id put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we dont have to wait til oil and coal run out before we tackle that. I wish I had a few more years left. -- Thomas Edison♽☯♑

[USMA:49525] Re: Screen size conundrum

2011-01-15 Thread James R. Frysinger
I don't know of any computer programming language up to and within FORTRAN's generation of languages that did or does use superscripts. Some higher (upper generation) languages such as MathCAD and Mathematica might perhaps use superscripts, though. In fact, computer languages are the source o

[USMA:49524] Re: Screen size conundrum

2011-01-15 Thread Martin Vlietstra
... FORTRAN did not have the luxury of superscripts and subscripts -Original Message- From: owner-u...@colostate.edu [mailto:owner-u...@colostate.edu] On Behalf Of James R. Frysinger Sent: 15 January 2011 16:52 To: U.S. Metric Association Subject: [USMA:49523] Re: Screen size conundrum Co

[USMA:49523] Re: Screen size conundrum

2011-01-15 Thread James R. Frysinger
Correction: E notation is not engineering notation. It is FORTRAN notation, since carried forth into other computer languages. Jim On 2011-01-15 1046, James R. Frysinger wrote: I can find no examples of engineering (E) notation in the SI Brochure. All of their examples are in terms of scientif

[USMA:49522] Re: Screen size conundrum

2011-01-15 Thread James R. Frysinger
I can find no examples of engineering (E) notation in the SI Brochure. All of their examples are in terms of scientific notation (×10). NIST SP 811 prefers scientific notation. Apart from that, Gene's preference might be fine for engineers and scientists, but I cannot imagine it being used in

[USMA:49521] Re: Screen size conundrum

2011-01-15 Thread mechtly
Well done John (Steele)! As I stated previously, we can always depend on you to find documentation in answer to questions on units of measurement, and their "correct" applications in accord with CGPM or NIST standards. Gene. Original message >Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:42:49 -0800 (PS

[USMA:49520] An interesting letter to the editor

2011-01-15 Thread Pat Naughtin
Dear All, This writer is making an interesting case for the immediate acceptance of the metric system -- the old ways are just too hard! See http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/14/AR2011011405860.html Cheers, Pat Naughtin LCAMS Author of the ebook, Metrication Leade