We have our QAM waveform running successfully using Matlab/Simulink and the
X310 USRP. We run with two laptops and two X310 USRPs and we can continuously
sends Pings between the two laptops. We get no underruns and everything works
fine as long as the data stream is continuous to the USRP (SDRu
Hey guys,
So it turns out Martin was correct. I needed to install at least the 3.11
firmware update. Unfortunately, it seems that most of the sources only
include 3.10 right now, which is why uhd_images_downloader/loader wasn't
working. Thanks for all the help guys
Thanks,
Taylor
On Mon,
Python2.7-dev is already installed, here is the full cmake print
==
➜ build cmake ..
--
-- Configuring the python interpreter...
-- Python interpreter: /usr/bin/python
-- Override with: -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
-- Could not
Well Done!
> I edited my custom block changing one of my wires from 'delay' to
'delay_val'
> I have no idea if/why this would cause an issue, but my reasoning behind
it might be that the compiler is getting confused when mapping the timing
constraints.
> Please let me know what you think about
>> No luck. I'll look into these:
>> https://files.ettus.com/manual/convert__common_8hpp.html
And after some code searching you can find how it(one of them) is done here
https://github.com/EttusResearch/uhd/blob/maint/host/lib/convert/convert_with_tables.cpp#L87-L92
This is for conversion from
I'm 99% sure it's `(int16_t)(x * 32768)` which is what I found in the
source code and I use it to save memory footprint. (Also the uhd
library doesn't seem to take advantage of simd)
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Dario Fertonani via USRP-users
wrote:
> No
No luck. I'll look into these:
https://files.ettus.com/manual/convert__common_8hpp.html
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Jeff Long via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Try (int16_t) round( x * 32767 )
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Dario Fertonani via USRP-users <
>
Try (int16_t) round( x * 32767 )
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Dario Fertonani via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Any pointer to a C/C++ function (maybe in the UHD source code, or a doc)
> that converts IQ samples from format fc32 to sc16? I'm referring to "CPU
> sample
Any pointer to a C/C++ function (maybe in the UHD source code, or a doc)
that converts IQ samples from format fc32 to sc16? I'm referring to "CPU
sample format", not "wire sample format".
For C++ UHD, I know fc32 is complex< float > and sc16 is complex< int16_t
>. I'm tempted to assume that each
Adam,
In the rfnoc_ce_auto_inst.v you posted, it looks like the NUM_CE (6) does
not match your actual number of CEs (2):
```
localparam NUM_CE = 6; // Must be no more than 14 (2 ports taken by
radio core & PS-PL DMA).
wire [NUM_CE*64-1:0] ce_flat_o_tdata, ce_flat_i_tdata;
wire [63:0]
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the update, we have done the same for similar reasons...
A couple of quick followups:
Are you considering supporting MSVC 2017 "soon"?
Do you guys ever consider officially supporting the intel compiler?
Thanks,
> On January 23, 2018 at 5:20 PM Martin Braun via
Hi again EJ and Martin,
With the fresh install, I am still receiving the same error with a few extra
error lines now. The error is shown below.
root@ettus-e3xx-sg1:~/localinstall/usr/share/uhd/images# uhd_usrp_probe
--args="fpga=usrp_e310_fpga_RFNOC.bit"[INFO] [UHDlinux; GNU C++ version
thank you,
It works and it can give me 2 signals, but central frequency of them is not
exact.
I think I must change tune_requset_t tune_request of them and I should set
same rf_freq for them and change policy of them to manual
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Martin Braun via USRP-users <
Hi Adam,
Please copy/paste your rfnoc_ce_auto_inst.v
In my experience, these errors are usually due to something wrong in this
file. Probably causes are that NUM_CE != the actual number of CEs. Or that
when you added a new CE, you didn't increment the index of the wires, so
two blocks are on the
dniu 23.01.2018 o 19:11, Martin Braun via USRP-users pisze:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:34:14AM +0100, Piotr Krysik via USRP-users wrote:
>> Hi Hideyuki,
>>
>> Our students were working (with my help) on synchronizing two USRPs B210
>> with use of Octoclock-G.
>> To make your code work without
15 matches
Mail list logo