[USRP-users] How to save data from multiple USRPs?

2018-09-20 Thread Kwansik Park via USRP-users
Hello! Now, I am trying to save data from multiple USRPs. Even though there is a file "rx_multi_samples.exe", as you know, it does not provide saving data. Is there anyone who can let me know how to deal with this problem? -- *Kwansik Park* School of Integrated Technology, Yonsei University Yons

Re: [USRP-users] X310 general Question

2018-09-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/21/2018 12:12 AM, Chintan Patel wrote: Marcus, Thanks. So, if I have the right PCIe driver and setup, can I use the X310 without GigE port being connected? In other words, when using PCIe is both the data and control plane carried over PCIe? Thanks Chintan Yes, absolutely. On Thu,

Re: [USRP-users] RFNoC TX Examples

2018-09-20 Thread Ryan Marlow via USRP-users
Hey Leo, Glad to hear you were able to work things out. One quick note about the code I attached previously. Located a minor typo/bug that you'll want to fix if you want to actually transmit useful data. > 219 radio_ctrl->set_rx_frequency(freq, radio_chan); > should be: > 219 radi

Re: [USRP-users] UDP packet channel id value

2018-09-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/20/2018 06:00 PM, Yun Li wrote: Hi Marcus, My code is like this: uhd::stream_args_t stream_args("fc32"); //complex floats stream_args.channels = { 1, 3 }; // vector of channel ids uhd::rx_streamer::sptr rx_stream = usrp->get_rx_stream(stream_args); ... In this case, can I expect the stre

Re: [USRP-users] UDP packet channel id value

2018-09-20 Thread Yun Li via USRP-users
Hi Marcus, My code is like this: uhd::stream_args_t stream_args("fc32"); //complex floats stream_args.channels = { 1, 3 }; // vector of channel ids uhd::rx_streamer::sptr rx_stream = usrp->get_rx_stream(stream_args); ... In this case, can I expect the streaming channel index 0/1 in UDP packet co

Re: [USRP-users] UDP packet channel id value

2018-09-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/20/2018 04:14 PM, Yun Li wrote: Hi Marcus, Thanks for the clarification. We do have a need to map the streaming channel index back to the channel id. Is there a fixed mapping formula? For example, if we are streaming channel 1 and 3, then 0 in the UDP means channel 1 and 1 in the UDP me

Re: [USRP-users] UDP packet channel id value

2018-09-20 Thread Yun Li via USRP-users
Hi Marcus, Thanks for the clarification. We do have a need to map the streaming channel index back to the channel id. Is there a fixed mapping formula? For example, if we are streaming channel 1 and 3, then 0 in the UDP means channel 1 and 1 in the UDP means channel 3 and so forth? Thanks. Yun

Re: [USRP-users] X310 general Question

2018-09-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/20/2018 03:26 PM, Chintan Patel via USRP-users wrote: Hello, Some high-level questions on the X310 architecture and implementation related to the GigE/PCIe support. The X310 allows host connectivity using 10G or PCIe connections. Is it implied that if the Ethernet interfaces are being

Re: [USRP-users] UDP packet channel id value

2018-09-20 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/20/2018 03:58 PM, Yun Li via USRP-users wrote: Hi there, We are capturing UDP packets while streaming multiple channels (RX channel 1 and 3 in particular) from N310 (UHD_3.13.0.2-1-g78745bda). Looking at UDP packets, it seems that the channel id field in the VRT header is actually set t

[USRP-users] UDP packet channel id value

2018-09-20 Thread Yun Li via USRP-users
Hi there, We are capturing UDP packets while streaming multiple channels (RX channel 1 and 3 in particular) from N310 (UHD_3.13.0.2-1-g78745bda). Looking at UDP packets, it seems that the channel id field in the VRT header is actually set to 0 and 1. I expect the value would be 1 and 3. Is there a

[USRP-users] X310 general Question

2018-09-20 Thread Chintan Patel via USRP-users
Hello, Some high-level questions on the X310 architecture and implementation related to the GigE/PCIe support. The X310 allows host connectivity using 10G or PCIe connections. Is it implied that if the Ethernet interfaces are being used to connect to the host, the PCIe is not being used? In the F

Re: [USRP-users] N310 and set_time_source()

2018-09-20 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Rather than a try/catch block, I just changed my code from usrp->set_time_source(val,mboard); to if (usrp->get_time_source(mboard)!=val) usrp->set_time_source(val,mboard); This seems to handle it for me. I also did the same for usrp->set_clock_source() because I was experiencing some long d

Re: [USRP-users] N310 and set_time_source()

2018-09-20 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Yes. I can do that. On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 12:14 PM Michael West wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Thanks for letting us know. We will look into that. It is hard to tell > from the error if MPM is doing the work and the RPC call is just timing out > or it is failing to execute in MPM altogether. We will

Re: [USRP-users] N310 and set_time_source()

2018-09-20 Thread Michael West via USRP-users
Hi Rob, Thanks for letting us know. We will look into that. It is hard to tell from the error if MPM is doing the work and the RPC call is just timing out or it is failing to execute in MPM altogether. We will try to reproduce it and see what is going on. In the meantime, is it possible for yo

[USRP-users] N310 and set_time_source()

2018-09-20 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
With the latest 3.13 release and the N310, I get an exception when calling usrp->set_time_source(). It seems that this should just be a warning (or nothing at all if the requested source is equal to the current source). I realize that with the N310, it is necessary to set the time source in the a

Re: [USRP-users] RFNoC TX Examples

2018-09-20 Thread Leandro Echevarría via USRP-users
Hey Ryan, Thanks a lot! I actually ended up doing pretty much the exact same things you described, and came up with a piece of code very similar to yours. Yours is neater though, so I will keep it ;-). Regards, Leo On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:52 PM Ryan Marlow wrote: > Hey Leo, > I haven't seen

Re: [USRP-users] UHD not getting full bandwidth on E310

2018-09-20 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
I sent this email out a little prematurely. The stock software works fine with the non-RFNoC flowgraph I have. Some difference are: Stock gnuradio-config-info -v = 3.7.13.4 uhd_usrp_probe = [INFO] [UHD] linux; GNU C++ version 7.3.0; Boost_106400; UHD_3.11.0.1-0-unknown My cross-compile gnu

[USRP-users] UHD not getting full bandwidth on E310

2018-09-20 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
I have a cross-compile setup for my E312 that is working fine. If I run a benchmark_rate using my compiled UHD and bitfile, it works as intended. I see about 10MHz throughput from the FPGA to the ARM before I start dropping samples, that is about right based on my readings. Now, if I use all