Hello,
I know that the 10GbE ethernet interface is adding an extra 500us round
trip time delay with fiber DAC. I tested it myself. 1 GbE would probably
give a similar delay as well. So do you think it would stay below our delay
budget of 250us?
Regards,
Akın
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 00:24 Nate Temple
Hi Rob,
Yes, that's correct, you can use the WR-LEN with the X310.
Regards,
Nate Temple
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:40 PM Rob Kossler wrote:
> Nate,
> Although the X3xx series to not natively support White Rabbit, I believe
> that they can get all of the benefits by using a WR-LEN in
Hi,
I would like to implement an RFNoC FFT that can work for lengths > 1024.
Here's what I think I know:
- Current size for CE-to-CE packets is restricted to 8000 bytes (2000
samples)
- Current RFNoC FFT size is tied to packet size and thus 1024 is the max
FFT size that can fit in a
Cherif. I will attempt to take a stab at a few of your questions. Don't take
my answers as 100% right
1 - All the blocks run at the same rate, but I am pretty sure you can implement
an MMCM within your block to lower the rate for your needs and then back up to
the crossbar rate. Don't
Cherif,
1) Changing the radio clock frequency is not simple and would leave you an
immense amount of knock on problems to address.
2) ADC and DAC are tightly coupled to the radio clk, they run on low jitter
versions of the same clock.
3) Absolutely, and that is the beauty of streaming style
Hello guys,
I am a researcher working with the X310 USRP. I have a couple of questions
regarding the Hardware clocks.
The bus_clock and radio_clk are by default respectively set at 166 MHz and 200
MHz.
And if I am right the crossbar clock ce_clk is also at 200 MHz. Is there a
solution to bring
On 02/28/2019 01:30 AM, Arun kumar Verma via USRP-users wrote:
Dear User
I am trying to combine bandwidth of two USRP B200 and get the final
bandwidth of around 100MHz. Our target is monitor the complete WiFi
band 2.4-2.5Ghz.
I am attaching the image file for grc file. Any suggestions?
Hi Jonathon,
Thanks for looking at the block, and spotting the mistake.
Unfortunately that doesn't stop the swig part from failing, so I'll keep
digging further.
Regards, Paul Boven.
On 28/02/2019 04:19, Jonathon Pendlum wrote:
Hi Paul,
Your Nocscript has an error on line 47, you are a
