Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error -- this time with script and log -- ignore last email

2019-09-21 Thread d.des via USRP-users
I've been a little embarassed at still not getting this so spent quite a bit of time trying to figure it out before replying -- with no luck. At this point you've provided everying except the gnuradio script so maybe that last piece will fix it. Here is my script and my output. I'm putting the add

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-09 Thread Nick Foster via USRP-users
ock. A register-controlled mux to select which > > operation you want. I'll think about adding that to the Theseus Cores > > project. > > > > Nick > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:18 PM d.des via USRP-users < > > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: >

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-07 Thread d.des via USRP-users
ot obvious from > > the > > noc_block_addsub code, the use of splitstream and dummy variables > > is > > very confusing. > > > > Tnx, > > Dave (and I'm sure many others, based on threads I've seen in > > searches) > > > > __

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-06 Thread d.des via USRP-users
s, based on threads I've seen in > > searches) > > > > > > From: Nick Foster > > Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:45:46 PM > > To: Quadri,Adnan > > Cc: usrp-users at lists.ettus.com > > Subject: Re: [USRP-users]

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-06 Thread Nick Foster via USRP-users
___ > From: Nick Foster > Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:45:46 PM > To: Quadri,Adnan > Cc: usrp-users at lists.ettus.com > Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error > > That shouldn't be. Even if you connect both outputs to the host? > > I

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-06 Thread d.des via USRP-users
confusing. Tnx, Dave (and I'm sure many others, based on threads I've seen in searches) From: Nick Foster Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:45:46 PM To: Quadri,Adnan Cc: usrp-users at lists.ettus.com Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error That shouldn't

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-03 Thread Quadri,Adnan via USRP-users
installation of rfnoc. Thanks, Adnan From: Nick Foster Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:45:46 PM To: Quadri,Adnan Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error That shouldn't be. Even if you connect both outputs to the host

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-03 Thread Nick Foster via USRP-users
-- >> *From:* Nick Foster >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 3, 2019 3:57 PM >> *To:* Quadri,Adnan >> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com >> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error >> >> I ran into this the other day and it's independent o

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-03 Thread Quadri,Adnan via USRP-users
to:adnan.qua...@louisville.edu>> Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com<mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> mailto:usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>> Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error I ran into this the other day and it's independent of the HLS component of the addsub block (since th

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-03 Thread Nick Foster via USRP-users
my flowgraph. I tried with different USRP > sources/Signal Sources as well. But it is the same error. > > Thanks, > Adnan > > -- > *From:* Nick Foster > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 3, 2019 3:57 PM > *To:* Quadri,Adnan > *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.

Re: [USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-03 Thread Nick Foster via USRP-users
I ran into this the other day and it's independent of the HLS component of the addsub block (since the interface is identical). You need to connect both outputs of the addsub block to something, even a null sink. I'm pretty sure this wasn't the intended behavior and also pretty sure that it wasn't

[USRP-users] Addsub HLS Block Error

2019-09-03 Thread Quadri,Adnan via USRP-users
Hello, We are trying to run the RFNoC addsub HLS block. I was able to build the FPGA Image and made sure in the noc_block verilog code to point to the HLS implementation for addsub block on RFNoC as opposed to the verilog/VHDL implementation. But when we run the example Flowgraph with two