-
> *From:* Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2018 4:39:55 PM
>
> *To:* Adam Kurisko
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
> processor
> Please post y
dam
From: Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:39:55 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
Please post your whole example.
On Fr
> *From:* Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2018 4:13:16 PM
>
> *To:* Adam Kurisko
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
> processor
> You don't need to do
us.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
You don't need to do anything at all. Just loop. Maybe sleep so you don't soak
up a whole CPU.
Nick
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, 1:10 PM Adam Kurisko
<adamk...@outlook.com<mailto:adamk...@outlook.com>&g
---------
> *From:* Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2018 2:51:46 PM
>
> *To:* Adam Kurisko
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
> processor
>
Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:51:46 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
That should work.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:45 AM Adam Kurisko
<adamk...@out
rom: Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:16:19 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
Have you verified timestamps are disabled? And have you issued a stream command
to
gt; Adam
> --
> *From:* Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2018 1:01:42 PM
> *To:* Adam Kurisko
> *Cc:* usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> *Subject:* Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
> processor
is actually streaming.
Thanks,
Adam
From: Nick Foster <bistrom...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 1:01:42 PM
To: Adam Kurisko
Cc: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] [E310 RFNoC] TX RX Loopback bypassing the ARM
processor
1. yes
2.
1. yes
2. RFNoC
I refer back to a post I wrote detailing loopback in the FPGA. It doesn't
work "out of the box" but can be made to with minor modification.
https://corvid.io/2017/04/22/stupid-rfnoc-tricks-loopback/
If you haven't used RFNoC before you should probably take on the Getting
Started
10 matches
Mail list logo
