I think you are referring to this diff:
https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/pull/84/files
My feedback would be to rewrite all uses of "e.g." and the associated
parentheticals. Follow-up sentences will do.
Then, I would match any mention of "web browsers" with examples of
Oh, it appears that we neglected to merge a pull request before pushing
out the new version. My fault.
On 1/24/23 6:42 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
Hi,
It looks like the -09 revision of the draft added XSS advice, only
applicable to browsers, but still doesn't mention the WHATWG work in
Hi,
It looks like the -09 revision of the draft added XSS advice, only
applicable to browsers, but still doesn't mention the WHATWG work in
internationalized domain names, which is what browsers actually use. Are
the parts of what the draft references as IDNA-DEFS and IDNA-PROTO fully
overlapping
Hello UTA WG,
In this version we have attempted to address feedback received in early
reviews by John Klensin (i18ndir/appsdir), Orie Steele (document
shepherd), and Qin Wu (opsdir). Many thanks to these reviewers for their
input.
Peter
On 1/24/23 12:11 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Using TLS in Applications WG of the IETF.
Title : Service Identity in TLS
Authors : Peter Saint-Andre
Rich Salz
Filename
