Thanks Ben.
I want to re-use my context for performance reasons, but some JavaScript
programs have constant global variables that cannot be re-defined, such as
those declared with let or const. To work around this, I thought I could
just evaluate each program in a closure by artificially
>
> Thanks, ok. let me go through and update. We have both Script.Run() calls
and vm.runScript() calls in our project.
So, we have to make sure, we are not making any JS calls, when either Run()
or vm.runScript() going on (as they will involve in code compilation) and
need to wait for its
It's not about the garbage collection operation being completed.
Presumably you have a call to v8::Script::Run() somewhere? When that call
returns, you can safely execute other scripts.
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:01 PM madana gopal
wrote:
> Thanks Jakob.
>
> Below is
Thanks Jakob.
Below is the backtrace. Here how can I identify, when I came out of event
loop. Because, we want cleanup calls to get called quickly.
*Backtrace:*
V8_Fatal
0x5ac3ec3
v8::Function::NewInstance(v8::Local, int,
v8::Local*) const* // calling javascript function here*
// app code
On May 11, 2018 at 4:36:12 PM, Ben Noordhuis (i...@bnoordhuis.nl) wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:05 PM, wrote:
> Yea, that makes sense. They do match up, but the function I use to get the
> context handle may be called more than once at the same time. I mean, the
> same
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:05 PM, wrote:
> Yea, that makes sense. They do match up, but the function I use to get the
> context handle may be called more than once at the same time. I mean, the
> same context may be entered multiple times concurrently and exited at
> different
On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 2:45:06 PM UTC-4, Ben Noordhuis wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
> > I've been wondering if it's possible to concurrently use v8::Locker.
> >
> > I'm binding to v8 from a single-threaded language that uses fibers for
> >
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
> I've been wondering if it's possible to concurrently use v8::Locker.
>
> I'm binding to v8 from a single-threaded language that uses fibers for
> concurrency (Crystal.) Since it's a single thread, v8::Locker is always
> instantly
I've been wondering if it's possible to concurrently use v8::Locker.
I'm binding to v8 from a single-threaded language that uses fibers for
concurrency (Crystal.) Since it's a single thread, v8::Locker is always
instantly available.
This seems fine, the bigger issue if with Context::Scope.
Hi Team,
We are using using node v6.9.0. We faced a crash, when there is a
javascript call being made from our app c++ code. Crash is happening
because, call is made within the DisallowJavascriptExecutionScope. This
scope is set in OptimizedCompileJob::GenerateCode() in compiler.cc.
Scenario
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Jane Chen wrote:
> Embedding v8 v5.3.
>
> Is there any way to reset global object for a context so that the context
> can be re-used?
>
> How is Context::DetachGlobal() is meant to be used?
>
> Thanks,
> Jane
You can't reset a context but you
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Anoop R. S. wrote:
> Thank you for the reply, Ben.
>>
>> Instead of v8::IndexedPropertyHandlerConfiguration, you may
>> want to use v8::NamedPropertyHandlerConfiguration.
>
> I am already using it. What I noticed is that, when I run the code
12 matches
Mail list logo