I write simple test (source at
github.comhttps://gist.github.com/AntonSizov/7463876),
like hello_world.cc, but the js is
var f = function (x) {++x; if(x 15000) return 0;return arguments.callee(x)
}; f(1)
Also it executes in `for` many times - 1, one by one in single thread.
stat()
Thanks a lot for your yelling :)
My general remark here is if you implement your own Buffer classes and not
doing what the rest of the language does, in the long run you will not be
able to benefit from all optimizations we will be doing to speed up
ArrayBuffers and typed arrays.
I know that our
That sounds like the optimizer kicking in.
You can improve startup performance (or so I'm told) by keeping a copy of
its script data (v8::ScriptData), which supposedly holds this information.
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
---
*cpp:*
static v8::Handlev8::Value myFunc(const
v8::FunctionCallbackInfov8::Value args) {
return Undefined();
}
HandleObjectTemplate global_templ = ObjectTemplate::New() ;
global_templ-Set(String::New(myFunc), FunctionTemplate::New(myFunc)) ;
*console:*
test.cc:138:80: error: invalid
2. Why cast to Object**?
Our objects typically contain several pointers to other objects, so
FIELD_ADDR points into one object, and that location contains a pointer to
the other object = Object**. The layout of the objects is described (well,
actually obscured ;-) in objects.h via tons of
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Steve Jonghee Yun yun.jong...@gmail.comwrote:
Q: Are there any differences between (**reinterpret_cast*Object(F
IELD_ADDR(p, offset))) and (*reinterpret_cast*Object***(FIELD_ADDR(p,
offset))) ?
Let's rename Object* to Foo and FIELD_ADDR(p, offset) to bar,
