On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 13:34 +1000, Magentus wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:40:33 +0200,
Jürg Billeter j...@bitron.ch wrote:
This should be `yield return i;'. We do not use/need `yield return'
for async methods, and I'm planning to add support for `yield return'
for generators in Vala the
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:40:33 +0200,
Jürg Billeter j...@bitron.ch wrote:
This should be `yield return i;'. We do not use/need `yield return'
for async methods, and I'm planning to add support for `yield return'
for generators in Vala the same way as it's used in C#. I don't see a
conflict
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 16:41 +0200, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
On 09/12/2009 01:34 PM, Jürg Billeter wrote:
2. purely asynchronous methods
There are actions that can't be
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 16:16 +0200, Jan Hudec wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 13:34:27 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
Hi Jiří,
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 00:27 +0200, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
--
1. yields keyword is far from intuitive
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 17:40:33 +0200, Jürg Billeter wrote:
This should be `yield return i;'. We do not use/need `yield return' for
async methods, and I'm planning to add support for `yield return' for
generators in Vala the same way as it's used in C#. I don't see a
conflict here.
Ok. You
Hi Jiří,
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 00:27 +0200, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
I did some thinking on the subject of asynchronous (aka yielding)
methods. I'd like to share and discuss some of my ideas here.
--
1. yields keyword is far from
