On Fri, 2 May 2008 02:41:11 -0700, Ricardo Newbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The problem with the example zope-plone.vcl is that it excludes ALL
cookie-authenticated responses -- even those inline images, css, and
javascript files that otherwise would be cacheable in downstream
caches -- making
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Are there any good reasons not to run Plone with the CacheFu (or
CacheSetup) product installed? Would a non-CacheFu example be of any
use?
CacheSetup monkeypatches a fair amount of things, which breaks some innocent
third party products. In general my advise
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2008 23:22:17 +0200, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have some improvements pending for that one as well: a few
cleanups and switching to url_purge.
Would it make sense, in vcl_recv, to put the PURGE check inside the
not GET and not
On May 5, 2008, at 6:02 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
Are there any good reasons not to run Plone with the CacheFu (or
CacheSetup) product installed? Would a non-CacheFu example be of any
use?
CacheSetup monkeypatches a fair amount of things, which breaks some
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Smith writes:
(1) I have a back-end that is very fast for validating ETags and generating
304 Not Modified, but very slow when it has to return a new response body.
My understanding is that Varnish will never send conditional requests to the
backend, and it
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Brian Smith writes:
(1) I have a back-end that is very fast for validating ETags and
generating
304 Not Modified, but very slow when it has to return a new response body.
My understanding is that Varnish will never send conditional requests to
the
backend, and it
