Yes, but the workarounds seem to replace x-forwarded-for with another
header, e.g., X-Real-Forwarded-For
(https://wiki.fourkitchens.com/display/PF/Workaround+for+Varnish+X-Forwarded-For+bug).
And the FAQ entry
(http://varnish-cache.org/wiki/FAQ#HowcanIlogtheclientIPaddressonthebackend)
seems to as
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:37 PM, pablort wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I've sucessfully created graphics based on varnishstat -1 output using cacti
> and snmp and I'd really like to do the same thing using varnishtop to graph
> TxStatus responses, but it didn't work as I expected.
>
> $ varnishtop -1
Isn't this the equivalent of and max-age=5 and s-maxage=0 ?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Bedis 9 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Netcache devices had the X-Accel-Cache-Control headers in order to
> allow an origin server to setup different Cache-Control parameters for
> the cache and the end-user.
> The ne
Have you tried google "varnish x-forwarded-for" ?
There an FAQ entry addressing that (somewhat).
[]'s
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:47 PM, John Norman wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Will the fix for http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/601 (cf.
> http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/540) be in the next release?
>
> My
Hello there,
I've sucessfully created graphics based on varnishstat -1 output using cacti
and snmp and I'd really like to do the same thing using varnishtop to graph
TxStatus responses, but it didn't work as I expected.
$ varnishtop -1 -i TxStatus
29481.00 TxStatus
3280.00 TxStatus
1196.00 T
I'll try to setup a lab environment and replay my acesslogs there until it
crashes. Need to finish graphics thou. :)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Tollef Fog Heen
wrote:
> ]] pablort
>
> | And how about 2.1 ? Any release date on the horizon ? :D
>
> Persistent needs more testing before we can
Right, -spersistent. Child restarts are persistent, parent process stop/start
isn't.
Maybe there's a graceful, undocumented method of stopping the parent that I'm
not aware of?
--
kb
On Jan 27, 2010, at 1:26 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Ken Brownfield
>
> | I'd love to test persistent u
Folks,
Will the fix for http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/601 (cf.
http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/540) be in the next release?
My Varnish gets a x-forwarded-for from another server: What will the
VCL be to use that instead of whatever Varnish tries to append?
John
Yes 504 is certainly given out by haproxy. It is known to do that :-/.
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Angelo Höngens wrote:
On 27-1-2010 8:58, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Angelo Höngens
| Can anyone tell me when a "504 Gateway Time-out" occurs exactly?
|
| I have varnish in front of haproxy, and whatev
]] Ken Brownfield
| I'd love to test persistent under production load, but right now it's
| not persistent. :-( (Storage doesn't persist through a parent restart)
That sounds like a real bug. Just to be sure, you're testing with
-spersistent, not -smalloc or -sfile?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
Redpil
Hi Tollef,
Thanks for the response.
-Paras
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Tollef Fog Heen
wrote:
> ]] Paras Fadte
>
> | Is prefetch by default enabled in varnish ?
>
> No, it is not implemented and any references to it should be ignored.
> It is also removed in trunk.
>
> --
> Tollef Fog Heen
Hi Poul,
Thanks for the response . So with grace mode is it possible to fetch an
object from backend about "x" seconds before its "expires" time is reached ?
Thank you.
-Paras
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <75cf5801001241820w3e4afd34v64ad2031b8b7...@mai
On 27-1-2010 8:58, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Angelo Höngens
>
> | Can anyone tell me when a "504 Gateway Time-out" occurs exactly?
> |
> | I have varnish in front of haproxy, and whatever I do to, I can only get
> | a "503 Service Unavailable" error, while my clients sometimes tell me
> | they
13 matches
Mail list logo
