On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:14:21PM +0200, Lazy wrote:
> 2009/7/15 Kristian Lyngstol :
> > You could try to turn on vcl-trace. (-p vcl_trace=on).
>
> right now i have something 100-200 req/s won't it kill the server and
> I can't restart varnish now so I will have try to enable it at runtime
Ok, I
2009/7/15 Kristian Lyngstol :
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Lazy wrote:
> (...)
>> setting 500 as min threads didn't make any diference, funny thing is
>> that failed requests are in logged in apache as succesful
>
> Sorry if I didn't make myself clear: The output from varnishstat did
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:38:27AM +0200, Lazy wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how many simultaneous users a single 8 core
> machine with local apache running as a backend can handle assumming
> that all the requests are cached.
This is actually very difficult to test, as you often end up with
c
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Lazy wrote:
(...)
> setting 500 as min threads didn't make any diference, funny thing is
> that failed requests are in logged in apache as succesful
Sorry if I didn't make myself clear: The output from varnishstat didn't
indicate that threads was the issue
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how many simultaneous users a single 8 core
machine with local apache running as a backend can handle assumming
that all the requests are cached.
testing with ab on a slow 100Mbps link shows 2500 hit/s, locally i got
12 000 hit/s with over 200Mbps traffic
assuming th
2009/7/15 Lazy :
> 2009/7/14 Ken Brownfield :
>> On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:05 AM, Kristian Lyngstol wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:46:58AM +0200, Lazy wrote:
the site is usually not so busy, but it has sometimes spikes of
static
traffic (about 50Mbps) that's why i upped the thread
