Bug fix 601 - Will be in the next release?
Folks, Will the fix for http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/601 (cf. http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/540) be in the next release? My Varnish gets a x-forwarded-for from another server: What will the VCL be to use that instead of whatever Varnish tries to append? John ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: Bug fix 601 - Will be in the next release?
Yes, but the workarounds seem to replace x-forwarded-for with another header, e.g., X-Real-Forwarded-For (https://wiki.fourkitchens.com/display/PF/Workaround+for+Varnish+X-Forwarded-For+bug). And the FAQ entry (http://varnish-cache.org/wiki/FAQ#HowcanIlogtheclientIPaddressonthebackend) seems to assume that there is nothing fronting Varnish that has already added an x-forwarded-for header (which is what the bug is about). In any case, I assume that the fix for bug 601 will go into the next release . . . On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:42 PM, pablort pablort+varn...@gmail.com wrote: Have you tried google varnish x-forwarded-for ? There an FAQ entry addressing that (somewhat). []'s On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:47 PM, John Norman j...@7fff.com wrote: Folks, Will the fix for http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/601 (cf. http://varnish-cache.org/ticket/540) be in the next release? My Varnish gets a x-forwarded-for from another server: What will the VCL be to use that instead of whatever Varnish tries to append? John ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: next release?
]] Sascha Ottolski | I'm curious when the next stable (minor) release is planned. I'm | especially interested in | | Date: 2008-11-14 01:19:33 +0100 (Fri, 14 Nov 2008) | New Revision: 3390 [...] | which seem to be in the trunk, but didn't made it into 2.0.2. I don't think I'll let 3390 into 2.0.3. It might be safe, but I would like to play it conservative. | If no release is planned, which trunk revision could be recommended for | productive environment? Just cherry-picking 3390 should work, it seems fairly self-contained. -- Tollef Fog Heen Redpill Linpro -- Changing the game! t: +47 21 54 41 73 ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
next release?
Hi folks, I'm curious when the next stable (minor) release is planned. I'm especially interested in Date: 2008-11-14 01:19:33 +0100 (Fri, 14 Nov 2008) New Revision: 3390 Modified: trunk/varnish-cache/lib/libvarnish/binary_heap.c Log: Rework the binary heap, we use for expiry processing, to deal more gracefully with large number of objects. which seem to be in the trunk, but didn't made it into 2.0.2. If no release is planned, which trunk revision could be recommended for productive environment? Thanks, Sascha ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Re: next release?
In message 200812211455.11650.ottol...@web.de, Sascha Ottolski writes: I'm curious when the next stable (minor) release is planned. I'm especially interested in I don't know if we have a plan as such, but I expect a minor release before I start integrating the persistent storage stuff. -trunk right now should be safe. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
