Ok. I've been running 3.0-beta1 over the weekend on one of our 4 main
varnishes.
The following (ugly and very long) url compares a 2.1 against the new
3.0 , seems to be behaving almost identical on moderate traffic
And a screenshot of varnishstat and varnishhist
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/866639/varnish-3.0-comp.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/866639/varnishhist-3.0-comp.png
Varnishist seems to indicate that it's a bit slower (The violet
terminal is the 3.0-beta1)
It also seems like it does not write it's fqdn
hello.
I made a basic «out of the box» varnish server to access a «personal» web
server ... in fact, just define a backend.
But I have a problem when I test the download of big object (iso with
~630Mb) with this message:
wget http://x/iso/ubuntu-zz-10.04.2-desktop-i386.iso
--2011-05-30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/30/11 05:39 PM, Patrick CAO HUU THIEN wrote:
hello.
I made a basic «out of the box» varnish server to access a «personal» web
server ... in fact, just define a backend.
But I have a problem when I test the download of big object (iso
