On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:59 PM Guillaume Quintard
wrote:
>
> What intrigues me is why the number of requests decreased. Hitting
> thread_pool_max should make the number of request plateau, not go down.
>
> If there's a loadbalancer that realizes requests are getting dropped, and so
> takes
What intrigues me is why the number of requests decreased.
Hitting thread_pool_max should make the number of request plateau, not go
down.
If there's a loadbalancer that realizes requests are getting dropped, and
so takes traffic away, it makes sense, just wanted to make sure.
If that's the case,
> > Did you try to increase thread_pool_max?
> >
>
> Yes, we increased thread_pool_max and thread_pool_min after that issue.
> For the moment all work fine.
FWIW, it's in the documentation of the threads_limited counter, which
you (and Guillaume) didn't seem to notice (or remember) before I
Hello,
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 3:06 PM Sébastien EISSLER wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Yes, we have a load-balancer in front, we already investigate that way and
> > don't dectect any error or configuration limitation.
> > The fact that threads_limited counter strongly increase and that
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 3:06 PM Sébastien EISSLER wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Yes, we have a load-balancer in front, we already investigate that way and
> don't dectect any error or configuration limitation.
> The fact that threads_limited counter strongly increase and that restart of
> Varnish
Hello,
Yes, we have a load-balancer in front, we already investigate that way and
don't dectect any error or configuration limitation.
The fact that threads_limited counter strongly increase and that restart of
Varnish restore the traffic suggest an issue on varnish side.
In attachement a
Hi,
Do you have a load-balancer in front of Varnish? The decrease looks like
the connections are being drained
Cheers,
--
Guillaume Quintard
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 8:12 AM Sébastien EISSLER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We encounter an issue on trafic increase event, here is the timeline:
>
> - We
