Re: [vbox-dev] Recent changes to vboxsf have introduced a bug? (was Opportunity to significantly shrink the vboxsf Linux driver)

2017-10-20 Thread Michael Thayer
Hello Hans, 08.08.2017 16:24, Hans de Goede wrote: [Discussion of r68101]. > It seems that you've introduced a bug there. You've removed the > > err = RT_FAILURE(err) ? -EPROTO : 0; > > Line after the VbglR0SfWritePhysCont() call, but that call returns > a VBox status code and sf_reg_write

Re: [vbox-dev] Recent changes to vboxsf have introduced a bug? (was Opportunity to significantly shrink the vboxsf Linux driver)

2017-08-08 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 07/25/2017 11:06 AM, Michael Thayer wrote: 13.07.2017 16:42, Michael Thayer wrote: 10.07.2017 12:29, Hans de Goede wrote: [Patch to shared folder code proposed by Hans to reduce the line count of the Linux driver.] I redid the patch again, after realising that the non-physical-page