Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities

2005-03-16 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote: Good morning, I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in valias and work fine when I send a message. The user in question is recently getting rejections. Here is

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities

2005-03-16 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Sorry for the previous message, this is indented better. At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote: Good morning, I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in valias and work fine when I send a message. The

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities

2005-03-16 Thread Dave Goodrich
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote: Good morning, I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in valias and work fine when I send a message. The user in question is recently

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities

2005-03-16 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 19.21 16/03/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote: Good morning, I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in valias and work fine when I send a message.

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 oddities

2005-03-16 Thread Dave Goodrich
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 19.21 16/03/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 15.31 16/03/2005, you wrote: Good morning, I recently installed chkuser in response to a SpamCop listing. I have a user getting addresses rejected that we know exist. The addresses are in valias and work