Re: [vchkpw] Working SMTP-AUTH-CRAM-MD5 after applied vchkpw.c.diff

2004-01-13 Thread Dean Henrichsmeyer
On Jan 12, 2004, at 4:39 PM, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote: Hello: I applied this vchkpw.c.diff patch from http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html and CRAM-MD5 authentication seems to be working (of course I also applied the smtp-auth patch to qmail). Can we get this worked into 5.4.0? :)

Re: [vchkpw] Working SMTP-AUTH-CRAM-MD5 after applied vchkpw.c.diff

2004-01-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Dean Henrichsmeyer wrote: I applied this vchkpw.c.diff patch from http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html and CRAM-MD5 authentication seems to be working (of course I also applied the smtp-auth patch to qmail). Can we get this worked into 5.4.0? :) It's already in

RE: [vchkpw] Working SMTP-AUTH-CRAM-MD5 after applied vchkpw.c.diff

2004-01-13 Thread David Hubbard
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Dean Henrichsmeyer wrote: I applied this vchkpw.c.diff patch from http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html and CRAM-MD5 authentication seems to be working (of course I also applied the smtp-auth patch to qmail).

Re: [vchkpw] Working SMTP-AUTH-CRAM-MD5 after applied vchkpw.c.diff

2004-01-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 13, 2004, at 10:13 AM, David Hubbard wrote: From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Dean Henrichsmeyer wrote: I applied this vchkpw.c.diff patch from http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html and CRAM-MD5 authentication seems to be working (of course I also