There should be no problem, except some flags (I don't remember exactly
which) that may be missing in the 5.2 vpopmail headers.
I suggest to try, and eventually modify the code where necessary.
Write me if you have any problems.
Ciao,
Tonino
At 21/01/2004 21/01/2004 -0500, Rick Macdougall
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 14:14, Martin wrote:
Hello.
URL:http://multivac.cwru.edu./qmail/#realrcptto
I have tried this on a basic qmail installation, and it works fine.
Basically, it holds the SMTP open whilst it checks if the user or .qmail
control files exists. If not, it gives a:
550
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 04:13 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
that patch just checks to see if there's a .qmail file to handle the
delivery. It doesn't actually attempt delivery at that time.
Therefore, vpopmail can't say hey, that mailbox doesn't exist.
If you're running a vpopmail only
Martin wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 04:13 pm, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
Thanks for the swift reply.
Is there an alternative solution ?
What do you suggest ?
This is mainly to protect against Joe-Jobs.
Hi,
http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/#qmail-smtpd
Works great here.
Regards,
Rick
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 05:17 pm, you wrote:
Hi,
http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/#qmail-smtpd
Works great here.
Regards,
Rick
Hello Rick.
I'd like to hear more about this from other people, ie. who has tried it,
opinions etc.
I note that on the web page, the patch version
Martin wrote:
http://www.interazioni.it/qmail/#qmail-smtpd
Works great here.
Regards,
Rick
Hello Rick.
I'd like to hear more about this from other people, ie. who has tried it,
opinions etc.
I note that on the web page, the patch version is given for vpopmail 5.3.6
5.3.25. These are
