My uplevel talked me into using an even simpler approach (more like yours),
making my original question partly moot. The two servers (freebsd jail
vps's actually) are binary-compatible so we just rsync'd the entire server
(vps). We will do a final rsync for the real transition after doing some
Hello
I use vpopmail5.4 on qmail-1.03.
I patched qmail-smtpd-auth.0.5.6 on
vpopmail5.4.
I want to use qmail-spf.patch on the same server
but I get a conflict while patching.
How can I patch both ?
Hi.
I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/127.0.0.1
as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending
account via bounce check (connecting to 127.0.0.1), the rcpt to: check
is ok, because chkuser accepts unknown rcpt to's from localhost. Is
there a
Hello
I use vpopmail5.4 on qmail-1.03.
I patched qmail-smtpd-auth.0.5.6 on vpopmail5.4.
I want to use qmail-spf.patch on the same server but I get a conflict while
patching.
How can I patch both of them ?
On 5/30/06, DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAve wrote: Ken Jones wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 22.53 22/05/2006, you wrote: Has anyone else run into this? A microsoft smtp service is sending an email with a list
of rcpt's. Some of the rcpt's are invalid. The microsoft keeps reporting
On 8/14/06, Jason S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/30/06, DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
DAve wrote: Ken Jones wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 22.53 22/05/2006, you wrote: Has anyone else run into this? A microsoft smtp service is sending an email with a list
of rcpt's. Some of the rcpt's
