On 8/14/06, Jason S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/30/06, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:DAve wrote:
> Ken Jones wrote:
>> tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
>>> At 22.53 22/05/2006, you wrote:
>>>> Has anyone else run into this?
>>>> A microsoft smtp service is sending an email with a list
>>>> of rcpt's. Some of the rcpt's are invalid. The microsoft
>>>> keeps reporting rejection of almost all the email addresses
>>>> including valid ones.
>>>> We are using fixcrio on the smtp server, so it's not
>>>> a bare line feed problem.
>>>> Using chkuser v.2.0.8.
>>>> Everything works fine when a qmail server sends the
>>>> same list of emails. All the good rcpts get the email
>>>> and all the invalid rcpts are rejected.
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>> I am looking into disabling the chk user for the
>>>> senders static IP address but wonder if there is
>>>> possibly something in the qmail/chkuser code that
>>>> needs looking into.
>>> What do chkuser logs say about these rejected rcpt?
>> For the rejected addresses seeing:
>> CHKUSER rejected .... not existing recipient
>> For the accepted addresses
>> CHKUSER accepted .... found existing recipient
>> We ran some other tests. If all the recipients are accepted the email
>> comes through to all the users.
>> If any one of the recipients are rejected then the sender says they
>> get a bounce message with valid and invalid recipients listed with
>> the regular qmail failure status of the form:
>> There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's
>> email server. Please contact your system administrator.
>> <HOST_SENDER #5.5.0 smtp;511 sorry, no mailbox
>> here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkuser)>
>> Thier email system returns a bounce message containing those
>> types of status for valid and invalid accounts.
>> And the chkuser log shows the correct information, reporting
>> invalid for invalid accounts and valid for existing accounts.
>> I'm going to run a test when I telnet to port 25 and walk
>> through the conversation by hand. Then check the logs and
>> received emails.
> I have been looking into the same issue since last week. I am waiting to
> confirm the client is using an exchange server at their location. The
> issue I am seeing is that the client has a distribution list with 22
> recipients in it. Once ten recipients fail, the message is bounced as
> per my chkuser setup.
> QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
> NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
> MAXSMTPD=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
> # CHKUSER values
> export CHKUSER_MBXQUOTA
> export CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT
> export CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT
> if [ -z "$QMAILDUID" -o -z "$NOFILESGID" -o -z "$MAXSMTPD" ]; then
> echo QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, or MAXSMTPD is unset in
> echo $0
> exit 1
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2000000 \
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -P -R -h -l ecluster4.tls.net -x
> cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
> -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 10.0.241.134 25 \
> /usr/local/bin/fixcrio /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
> Addresses that are valid are rejected until the rejection count goes
> over the intrusion threshold, even though the user exists and still
> receives mail otherwise.
> 26-196-65.tls.net:188.8.131.52> rcpt < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> : not existing
> 2006-05-10 17:30:32.579064500 CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote <JHexamerGardner:wls-41-2
> 26-196-65.tls.net:65 .196.226.41> rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > : not existing
> 2006-05-10 17:30:36.283696500 CHKUSER intrusion threshold: from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote <JHexamerGardner:wl
> s-41-226-196-65.tls.net:184.108.40.206> rcpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : max
> number of allowed invalid rcpt
> 2006-05-10 17:30:36.543197500 CHKUSER rejected intrusion: from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]::> remote <JHexamerGardner:wls
> bash-2.05b# ./vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> name: lisah
> passwd: xxxxx
> clear passwd: xxxxx
> comment/gecos: lisah
> uid: 0
> gid: 0
> flags: 0
> gecos: lisah
> limits: No user limits set.
> dir: /home/vpopmail/domains/1/xxxxx.com/lisah
> quota: NOQUOTA
> usage: NOQUOTA
> last auth: Mon Mar 27 15:22:13 2006
> last auth ip: 10.0.241.134
> I see no issues with the MySQL backend, but I am updating the MySQL
> install tonight so I can use query caching. Not sure if that will make a
> difference or not but I wanted the advantage of caching to reduce load
> on my SQL server.
> I am seeing this with one client only, and the issue is intermittent at
> that. Using chkuser-2.0.8b-release. Anything else I can offer?
There is no Exchange server involved.
Looking closer I see that the user was in her office, so I am not sure
why she even hit chkuser! She should have been on smpt-auth from her IP
and I don't use chkuser for smpt-auth clients.
The message has failed twice in two weeks and worked three times. Last
attempt worked perfectly.
This message was checked by forty monkeys and
found to not contain any SPAM whatsoever.
Your monkeys may varyHas anyone else had any luck with this issue? I'm seeing the same scenario using chkuser v.2.0.8 with delivery to a group of recipients from MS Exchange server. One bad address in a group of recipients results in the exchange server reporting failure for all recipients.
Nevermind - found the reply - sorry.