Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Abuse

2005-04-14 Thread Rick Macdougall
Bill Wichers wrote: I totally agree with you and I know that I'm blocking what I don't want to, but if I don't, my server gets so busy that nobody can send messages cause it's a small machine to handle only two domains, one with 2 and other with 154 accounts, and I only have some load on a busines

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Abuse

2005-04-14 Thread Bill Wichers
> I totally agree with you and I know that I'm blocking what I don't want > to, but if I don't, my server gets so busy that nobody can send messages > cause it's a small machine to handle only two domains, one with 2 and > other with 154 accounts, and I only have some load on a business hours. > >>

Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd return/bounce message ?!

2005-04-14 Thread Walter Souto R. Junior
Hi Marco, /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -C \ -r "list.dsbl.org:Your mail server is listed in DSBL list." \ -r "bl.spamcop.net:Your mail server is listed in Spamcop blocklist." \ -r "relays.ordb.org:Your mail server is an OPEN RELAY (ORDB list)." \ -r "sbl.spamhaus.o

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Abuse

2005-04-14 Thread Walter Souto R. Junior
Hi Rick, I don't know what you can do. What you have done so far is block legitimate email servers from sending your clients email, while reducing your load, it is not a good practice. If you are going to do something like that you might as well just turn off your mail server. I totally agr

Re: [vchkpw] Re: compile "vpopmail" with -fPIC on x86_64

2005-04-14 Thread Marco Prechel
Josh, I have not been able to get Courier-IMAP installed yet. I went ahead and installed BINCIMAP - works great. I also have a script for it to so one doesn't have to move all the mails to the IMAPdir that will be used with BINC. --marco On Apr 12, 2005, at 6:24 PM, Joshua Kolden wrote: I just

[vchkpw] rblsmtpd return/bounce message ?!

2005-04-14 Thread Marco Prechel
Hello, with the rblsmtpd setup, if a valid email is sent, and the server/sender happens to be listed in one of the RBL sites, the email gets bounced, correct? or does it just get absorbed into a dark hole on the backside of the server ;-) ? if the message get bounced, is there a(n) (error) messag

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Abuse

2005-04-14 Thread Rick Macdougall
Walter Souto R. Junior wrote: Rick, Looks to me like someone used your domain(s) as the From address when sending out spam, those messages bounced to who ever the sent them to and now they are being returned (falsely, but what are you going to do about faked From addresses). Happens to us e

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Abuse

2005-04-14 Thread Walter Souto R. Junior
Rick, Looks to me like someone used your domain(s) as the From address when sending out spam, those messages bounced to who ever the sent them to and now they are being returned (falsely, but what are you going to do about faked From addresses). Happens to us every so often as well, usually

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Abuse

2005-04-14 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Hi Walter, At 20.10 13/04/2005, you wrote: Hi Tonix, If remote user is sending using an authenticated SMTP session, you would find his name within chkuser logging. Look at these entries from my smtpd log: @4000425d6a992de7abbc.s:@4000425d6a2c106b451c CHKUSER rejected rcpt: from <::> remote