Re: [vchkpw] Re: compile vpopmail with -fPIC on x86_64

2005-05-08 Thread Red
Thanx Marco, i got BINC running up, google is always my best friend. I think 
i`ll stay with BINC even courier-imap get running on x86-64.

Rene
- Original Message - 
From: Marco Prechel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: compile vpopmail with -fPIC on x86_64


Rene,
I'm sorry - i hadn't monitored this list in a few weeks. Did you ever  get 
this taken care off? i finally got BINCIMAP running fine, it  seems to be 
a little harder on the system when downloading LARGE  mailboxes (800mb / 
90K mails), however it is stable  runs fine.  would i prefer courier if i 
could get it to compile on x86 ? YES!  however binc works just fine, and 
the config files are way simpler  than courier.

let me know if you still need the script.
--marco

On Apr 20, 2005, at 5:07 PM, Red wrote:
Can uou share your script and little how-to with binc for me  please? I 
did HW upgrade to X86-64 but i can`t get imap working  like i used before 
and i really need imap connect to my mailserver.  I didn`t hear about 
BINCimap yet, but i`ll give it a try.

Rene
- Original Message - From: Marco Prechel 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Cc: Marco Prechel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: compile vpopmail with -fPIC on x86_64


Josh,
I have not been able to get Courier-IMAP installed yet. I went  ahead 
and installed BINCIMAP - works great. I also have a script  for it to so 
one doesn't have to move all the mails to the IMAPdir  that will be used 
with BINC.

--marco

On Apr 12, 2005, at 6:24 PM, Joshua Kolden wrote:

I just subscribed to the list because I found this e.mail heading  on a 
web search.  The web thread doesn't seem to have ever come  to an 
answer.

Did anyone solve this problem for 64bit machines yet?  Our mail  server 
just died, and I have no choice but to use one of our  64bit machines 
to run the mail server.

Thanks,
j








RE: [vchkpw] qmail-tap

2005-05-08 Thread Andrew Preece
Thanks for the help Jeremy, 
They're vpopmail aliases, if that makes any difference? 
How would one eliminate the duplicate messages with procmail or maildrop?
Is there a best way?
-Andrew.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 4:51 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail-tap

On Friday 06 May 2005 05:08 pm, Andrew Preece wrote:
 I know this probably isn't the right mailing list to post this, but the
 problem I'm having seems to be partially caused by vpopmail.
 I'm a gentoo user, and I hacked the qmail ebuild to include the qmail-tap
 patch, but whenever it logs an email, it logs it once for each alias it
 goes through on the system,

assuming you're talking about 'forwards' of course this will happen.

when a .qmail file with a '' delivery instruction (forward) is encountered,

qmail-local queues a new message with the recipient.  This will cause the 
qmail-tap patch (or stock qmail with the QUEUE_EXTRA modification) to again 
process the extra recipient.

There is no way around this, however, there are methods of eliminating 
duplicate messages at delivery time (procmail, maildrop)

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies,
Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l
  kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
 GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]