-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've submitted changes to 5.5 so that it will compile and run under
Solaris.
Many of these changes will need to be made in 5.4.29. That is my next
task :)
- --
/*
Matt BrookingsGnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer
In your example the thing that pops out is the user you add is "mike42"
however the user you're assigning the domain to is "mike4". Is this a
typo? Or deliberate?
t.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mussulis [mailto:mike_at...@hotmail.com]
Sent: December-01-09 8:19 AM
To: vchkpw@inter7.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've also posted a patch that implements similar fixes from 5.5, in 5.4.29.
- --
/*
Matt BrookingsGnuPG Key FAE0672C
Software developer Systems technician
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ChangeLog as follows:
5.5.0 - Current
Matt Brookings
- Fixed a small build bug with cdb
- Updated vusaged subdirectory to use main source tree's copy of storage.h
- Fixed a number of issues with FreeBSD detection of endian and handling of
64b
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your reply, which is what I suspected all along - I am more than
certain something is wrong on my end, but for the life of me I can't figure it
out yet. And yes, I agree, it MUST be permission related.
As for the versions:- Fedora 12 x86- qmail 1.03 with jms1 combined patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Mussulis wrote:
> Guys,
>
> There's one thing I don't understand - why does vadddomain have the -u and
> -i/-g options in the first place, if they don't seem to work fully?
>
> Perhaps I am missing something for which I apologize, but I can'
Kindlly help me in uninstalling vpopmail...
Thanks
--- On Fri, 11/27/09, Remo Mattei wrote:
From: Remo Mattei
Subject: Re: Re[10]: [vchkpw] Issues with vpopmail
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 7:42 PM
Re: Re[10]: [vchkpw] Issues with vpopmail
I
am not sure what he i
Guys,
There's one thing I don't understand - why does vadddomain have the -u and
-i/-g options in the first place, if they don't seem to work fully?
Perhaps I am missing something for which I apologize, but I can't imagine those
options having been implemented to partially support non vpopmail