Alex Borges wrote:
While youre considering proprietary solutions and naturally, would like
to pay for them, perhaps you should consider redhat's GFS thingie. Its
GPL but redhat offers it with their AS for an extra $$
Ive seen it work and it seems like quite a scalable solution and
tipically
Nicholas Harring wrote:
Hi,
when going the Maildir on NFS for clustering-route, is using NetApp
Filers still considered state of the art or has something better
emerged?
There are plenty of other NAS options, see EMC for one vendor (also not
cheap). Dell offers NAS, HP I believe does as
Nicholas Harring wrote:
Hi,
when going the Maildir on NFS for clustering-route, is using
NetApp
Filers still considered state of the art or has something better
emerged?
There are plenty of other NAS options, see EMC for one vendor (also
not
cheap). Dell offers NAS, HP I believe
Hi,
when going the Maildir on NFS for clustering-route, is using NetApp
Filers still considered state of the art or has something better emerged?
From a price-point, I'd rather use FreeBSD, but the fact that there's
no real volume-manager makes it unusable for our purposes.
I've actually
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Hi,
when going the Maildir on NFS for clustering-route, is using NetApp
Filers still considered state of the art or has something better emerged?
From a price-point, I'd rather use FreeBSD, but the fact that there's
no real volume-manager makes it unusable for our
Hi,
when going the Maildir on NFS for clustering-route, is using NetApp
Filers still considered state of the art or has something better
emerged?
There are plenty of other NAS options, see EMC for one vendor (also not
cheap). Dell offers NAS, HP I believe does as well. Not sure how much
While youre considering proprietary solutions and naturally, would like
to pay for them, perhaps you should consider redhat's GFS thingie. Its
GPL but redhat offers it with their AS for an extra $$
Ive seen it work and it seems like quite a scalable solution and
tipically cheaper than buying a
