Re: 0.70ac1 patch

2001-08-01 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Ken, On Wednesday, August 01, 2001 at 9:02:46 PM you wrote: >> Why not using a 'dereferral' page? One of the biggest german freemailer had a >> similar problem with session data in referrer string and they build a good >> working dereferral page that is not given the session data in query

Re: 0.70ac1 patch

2001-08-01 Thread Ken Jones
Peter Palmreuther wrote: > > Hello Ken, > > On Wednesday, August 01, 2001 at 8:10:46 PM you wrote: > > > To be on the safe side we should remove the link. > > Sorry for jumping in, but I've a suggestion: > > Why not using a 'dereferral' page? One of the biggest german freemailer had a > simil

Re: 0.70ac1 patch

2001-08-01 Thread Oden Eriksson
Ken Jones writes: > Oden Eriksson wrote: >> >> Ken Jones writes: >> >> > Oden Eriksson wrote: >> >> >> >> Ken Jones writes: >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I updated the distribution with Bills (Alan Cox?) :) patch and >> >> > updated the version to 0.70. >> >> > >> >> > One change, I put the version i

Re: 0.70ac1 patch

2001-08-01 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Ken, On Wednesday, August 01, 2001 at 8:10:46 PM you wrote: > To be on the safe side we should remove the link. Sorry for jumping in, but I've a suggestion: Why not using a 'dereferral' page? One of the biggest german freemailer had a similar problem with session data in referrer string

Re: 0.70ac1 patch

2001-08-01 Thread Ken Jones
Oden Eriksson wrote: > > Ken Jones writes: > > > Oden Eriksson wrote: > >> > >> Ken Jones writes: > >> > >> > > >> > I updated the distribution with Bills (Alan Cox?) :) patch and > >> > updated the version to 0.70. > >> > > >> > One change, I put the version in the footer with a link to > >> >