07 11:17
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Hi,
They patch it for their greylisting solution, enabling it to do reverse
DNS checks and how it handles RBLSMTPD connections, or maybe they used
the Bill Shupp toaster version. :)
Were is this patch?
Cheers
Matt
JPC InfoNet Li
puter.
==
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2007 02:21
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Matthew Moore wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yup they all have .qmail files. Qmail-inject has been recompiled a
fair
>
ginal Message-
From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2007 02:34
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Matthew Moore wrote:
Hi,
I can see in my qmail send log -
@4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral:
qmail-inject:_
puter.
==
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2007 02:34
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail errors
Matthew Moore wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I can see
Matthew Moore wrote:
Hi,
I can see in my qmail send log –
@4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral:
qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX
"Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/
Now what seems strange is the email
Hi,
I can see in my qmail send log -
@4000474479971c31105c delivery 79455: deferral:
qmail-inject:_fatal:_unable_to_parse_this_line:/To: XX
"Car/write_to_qmail-inject_failed:_32/system_error_calling_qmail-inject/
Now what seems strange is the email has already been accepted
