Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-22 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 19.09 16/08/2006, you wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:07:28 -0700 Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ > > 127.0.0.1 > > as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending > > account via bounce check (connect

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-16 Thread Veit Guna
Yes, I agree with Lars. Also other "local" IPs should be checked like 10.x.y.z something. regards, Veit Lars Uhlmann schrieb: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:07:28 -0700 Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ >>> 127.0.0.1 >>> as

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-16 Thread Lars Uhlmann
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:07:28 -0700 Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ > > 127.0.0.1 > > as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending > > account via bounce check (connecting to 127.0.0.1), the rcpt to: >

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-16 Thread Tom Collins
On Aug 14, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Veit Guna wrote: I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/ 127.0.0.1 as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending account via bounce check (connecting to 127.0.0.1), the rcpt to: check is ok, because chkuser accepts "unknow

[vchkpw] chkuser + localhost as sender MX

2006-08-14 Thread Veit Guna
Hi. I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g. localhost/127.0.0.1 as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the sending account via bounce check (connecting to 127.0.0.1), the rcpt to: check is ok, because chkuser accepts "unknown" rcpt to's from localhost. Is there a setti