Re: [vchkpw] Anyone using vpopmail 5.4.11?
Tom Collins wrote: On May 20, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Tom Collins wrote: On May 20, 2005, at 7:47 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Been running it in production here since you released it Tom. Aside from the missing int i; everything works here. Rick, Can you confirm that it's working properly for forward/save-a-copy? I was told that it would forward the message, but the saved copy would just be a single Received header. I think it has something to do with the 'make seekable' code. Sure, Hold one sec... Yup, it's broken Rick, Can you pull the stable-5_4 branch from developer CVS and give that a shot? I was able to reproduce the problem on my machine, and I think I found the cause. If you confirm that I've nailed it, I'll release 5.4.12 ASAP for others to test further. Hi, Yes, done and the problem is fixed with this release. I tested a few other things and nothing else seems broken. Regards, Rick
Re: [vchkpw] Anyone using vpopmail 5.4.11?
Tom Collins wrote: On May 20, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Tom Collins wrote: On May 20, 2005, at 7:47 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Been running it in production here since you released it Tom. Aside from the missing int i; everything works here. Rick, Can you confirm that it's working properly for forward/save-a-copy? I was told that it would forward the message, but the saved copy would just be a single Received header. I think it has something to do with the 'make seekable' code. Sure, Hold one sec... Yup, it's broken Rick, Can you pull the stable-5_4 branch from developer CVS and give that a shot? I was able to reproduce the problem on my machine, and I think I found the cause. If you confirm that I've nailed it, I'll release 5.4.12 ASAP for others to test further. Hi, It's a holiday here and we are just leaving to go on a hike to the falls. I'll try and grab that later this afternoon or this evening and give it a shot. Rick
Re: [vchkpw] Anyone using vpopmail 5.4.11?
On May 20, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Tom Collins wrote: On May 20, 2005, at 7:47 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Been running it in production here since you released it Tom. Aside from the missing int i; everything works here. Rick, Can you confirm that it's working properly for forward/save-a-copy? I was told that it would forward the message, but the saved copy would just be a single Received header. I think it has something to do with the 'make seekable' code. Sure, Hold one sec... Yup, it's broken Rick, Can you pull the stable-5_4 branch from developer CVS and give that a shot? I was able to reproduce the problem on my machine, and I think I found the cause. If you confirm that I've nailed it, I'll release 5.4.12 ASAP for others to test further. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: sniffter.com
Re: [vchkpw] Anyone using vpopmail 5.4.11?
Tom Collins wrote: On May 20, 2005, at 7:47 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Been running it in production here since you released it Tom. Aside from the missing int i; everything works here. Rick, Can you confirm that it's working properly for forward/save-a-copy? I was told that it would forward the message, but the saved copy would just be a single Received header. I think it has something to do with the 'make seekable' code. Sure, Hold one sec... Yup, it's broken email sent to tom1, tom1 setup to store and forward. tom1 email contains Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom2 email contains Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 31859 invoked by uid 1008); 20 May 2005 20:15:21 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 31854 invoked by uid 1017); 20 May 2005 20:15:21 - Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail by uid 1008 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamdscan: 0.73. Clear:RC:1(192.197.166.3):. Processed in 0.094039 secs); 20 May 2005 20:15:21 - Received: from gateway-166-3.aei.ca (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.1 97.166.3) by 207.170.253.138 with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 20 May 2005 20:15 :20 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 16:15:51 -0400 From: Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just a test Rick Regards, Rick
Re: [vchkpw] Anyone using vpopmail 5.4.11?
On May 20, 2005, at 7:47 AM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Been running it in production here since you released it Tom. Aside from the missing int i; everything works here. Rick, Can you confirm that it's working properly for forward/save-a-copy? I was told that it would forward the message, but the saved copy would just be a single Received header. I think it has something to do with the 'make seekable' code. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: sniffter.com
Re: [vchkpw] Anyone using vpopmail 5.4.11?
Hi, Been running it in production here since you released it Tom. Aside from the missing int i; everything works here. Regards, Rick Tom Collins wrote: Has anyone been using (or even testing) vpopmail 5.4.11? I haven't gotten much in the way of feedback on it, and I was wondering if some brave souls out there were successfully using it. I did get one report that it wasn't properly handling "forward and save a copy" in a user's .qmail file, but I didn't see that in my early testing. Any other feedback? I haven't had much time to spend on vpopmail, but if I can find some I'd like to get the new vdelivermail out there. -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: sniffter.com
Re: [vchkpw] Anyone using vpopmail 5.4.11?
Seems fine at the moment. Butthen, I'm probably not bullying it enough .. :o) Regards, Chris. --- Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone been using (or even testing) vpopmail > 5.4.11? I haven't gotten much in the way of > feedback on it, and I waswondering if some > brave souls out there were successfully using it. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Re: [vchkpw] Anyone using vpopmail 5.4.11?
Tom Collins escribió: > Has anyone been using (or even testing) vpopmail 5.4.11? I'm trying it but i can't compile it, i get an error with make. Here is my configure: $ ./configure --prefix=/home/vpopmail \ --enable-tcpserver-file=/etc/tcp.smtp --enable-logging=y \ --enable-domainquotas --enable-auth-module=mysql \ --enable-sql-logging --enable-qmail-ext $ make [...] gcc -I. -I/usr/local/mysql/include -I. -I. -I. -g -O2 -Wall -c `test -f 'vdelivermail.c' || echo './'`vdelivermail.c vdelivermail.c: In function `get_arguments': vdelivermail.c:205: error: `i' undeclared (first use in this function) vdelivermail.c:205: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once vdelivermail.c:205: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [vdelivermail.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/src/vpopmail-5.4.11' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/src/vpopmail-5.4.11' make: *** [all] Error 2 Without option "--enable-qmail-ext" it compiles perfectly. Let me know if you need further details. Thanks a lot for your work. Kind regards, Raúl Galicia.
