Re: [vchkpw] Further thoughts on my localrelay patch

2007-01-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2007-01-03, at 1625, Joshua Megerman wrote: ... I've even used one of the small patches on your site (the date- localtime patch), although I'm not sure if you wrote it or not (there's no credit in the file itself, and I've seen it credited to 2 different people out there, neither of them

Re: [vchkpw] Further thoughts on my localrelay patch

2007-01-03 Thread Joshua Megerman
> it's out. i'm running it now. > > wait- rick, did you forget to announce it on this list, or is it not > for general consumption yet? i downloaded it from sourceforge and it > works fine, including the onchange stuff. > Huh - so it is. Posted 12/30/06. Maybe I misunderstood the last message abo

Re: [vchkpw] Further thoughts on my localrelay patch

2007-01-03 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:48 AM, John Simpson wrote: there does need to be a way to set what gets added to the smtpd access control file for dynamic entries. i'm not sure that highjacking an existing option is the right way to do it, nor do i think it should be a configure option. i think it mak

Re: [vchkpw] Further thoughts on my localrelay patch

2007-01-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2007-01-03, at 1436, Joshua Megerman wrote: look at the 5.4.18 source code for the call_onchange() function (at the end of vpopmail.c), see how it works, and how it gets called from various places in the code. then consider writing a call_onauth() function similar to that, and then calling i

Re: [vchkpw] Further thoughts on my localrelay patch

2007-01-03 Thread Joshua Megerman
> Josh just as curiosity what will they mega patch for qmail include? > Funny you should ask... >> Will do (once it's out :)) - I'm a little busy working on a couple of >> other things, like releasing my Uber-Mega-qmail patch set (the patches >> are >> done, but documenting them takes time... :),

Re: [vchkpw] Further thoughts on my localrelay patch

2007-01-03 Thread Remo Mattei
Josh just as curiosity what will they mega patch for qmail include? Thanks, Remo Joshua Megerman wrote: > Whoa... I wasn't expecting that... Just don't send me flowers or > anything, OK? :) > > OK, I think I'm seeing where you're going with this, and while it'll take > a little design work (no

Re: [vchkpw] Further thoughts on my localrelay patch

2007-01-03 Thread Joshua Megerman
> On 2007-01-02, at 1018, Joshua Megerman wrote: >> >> So we now have the question: What is the best way to proceed. I >> think >> that I would like to see the following changes made to the whole >> "roaming >> users" functionality in Vpopmail: >> >> 1) Document that the auth-before-smtp RELAYCL

Re: [vchkpw] Further thoughts on my localrelay patch

2007-01-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2007-01-02, at 1018, Joshua Megerman wrote: So we now have the question: What is the best way to proceed. I think that I would like to see the following changes made to the whole "roaming users" functionality in Vpopmail: 1) Document that the auth-before-smtp RELAYCLIENT="" functional