We are still using VMware Server so I would vote "yes". (We also use
Xen, VirtualBox,
and KVM prioritized in that order.)
Mark
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> When we released VCL 2.1, we had the following road map for 2
ginal Message-
From: Josh Thompson [mailto:josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:04 PM
To: vcl-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: proposed change to release Road Map
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When we released VCL 2.1, we had the following road map for 2.
I think that sounds like a great idea, and I agree, having VMWare Free Server
2.x support sounds more beneficial.
On 2/9/10 12:04 PM, "Josh Thompson" wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When we released VCL 2.1, we had the following road map for 2.2 and 2.3:
VCL 2.2
* s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When we released VCL 2.1, we had the following road map for 2.2 and 2.3:
VCL 2.2
* support for xCAT 2.3
* improve cluster reservations
* improve block reservations(rename to block allocations)
VCL 2.3
* Service deployments
* pow
