Re: VCL Architecture Change Proposal

2009-05-12 Thread Henry E Schaffer
I'm giving my own viewpoint - from outside the group working on the architecture - but I do have some experience with software projects. Brian writes: > This cloud proposal is new and different, and it will redesign and > likely recode the existing VCL core. Although it seems different,

Re: VCL Architecture Change Proposal

2009-05-12 Thread Brian Bouterse
This cloud proposal is new and different, and it will redesign and likely recode the existing VCL core. Although it seems different, this experimental architecture is designed to accommodate the current roadmap through a different architecture implementation. The fundamental assumption is

Re: VCL Architecture Change Proposal

2009-05-12 Thread Aaron Peeler
Hi Brian, I have some additional concerns. Don't take this the wrong way, it's great to think ahead, but I not sure this is the right time for such a major proposal. As you know the apache VCL project is still in incubation stage and we're struggling to get off the ground, grow the community

Re: VCL Architecture Change Proposal

2009-05-11 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian, I haven't finished reading through all of the details in the document you created in the wiki, but it seems to be a design document for a new/different cloud system. I didn't see anything explaining how it relates to VCL in its current form

VCL Architecture Change Proposal

2009-05-11 Thread Brian Bouterse
I propose exploring an alternative VCL architecture through an experimental code branch at Apache.org. This code would be housed in the svn at apache.org as a branch, and would be explored/developed in parallel with the current 2.X branch. The purpose of this branch is to explore a VCL ar