Re: Lost Repository Was: Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-04 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Joey, Am So den 4. Dez 2011 um 2:02 schrieb Joey Hess: > > Am Fr den 2. Dez 2011 um 21:54 schrieb Klaus Ethgen: > > > Not only that, also a "git annex fsck" will bring it back. But I wonder > > > where it gets the description and ID of the

Re: new mr patches on their way (not quite ready yet though)

2011-12-04 Thread Adam Spiers
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Joey Hess wrote: > Adam Spiers wrote: >> OK, so to summarise, would it be correct to say that you are prepared >> to review >> >>   (a) a master branch only containing self-contained commits >> >> and/or >> >>   (b) topic branches which contain a series of non-self-

New integration branch

2011-12-04 Thread Adam Spiers
OK, as discussed, here's a new 'for-joey' branch based off current upstream master: https://github.com/aspiers/kitenet-mr/commits/for-joey All commits are self-contained, and hopefully non-contentious. They are mostly minor bugfixes, but there are a few enhancements too - most notably lib/stow

git annex map does not spot graph loops

2011-12-04 Thread Adam Spiers
I set up two git annex repos on the local machine which point to each other and then run git annex map, it chews up a load of CPU, presumably trying to traverse the cyclic repository graph without ever noticing there's a loop: % mkdir -p annex-test/{a,b} % cd annex-test/a % git init Initialized em

git annex --help doesn't show manual page

2011-12-04 Thread Adam Spiers
$ git annex --help No manual entry for git-annex Is this issue related to the fact that I installed git-annex with cabal install? ___ vcs-home mailing list vcs-home@lists.madduck.net http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home

Re: git annex --help doesn't show manual page

2011-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
Adam Spiers wrote: > $ git annex --help > No manual entry for git-annex > > Is this issue related to the fact that I installed git-annex with cabal > install? Yes, as far as I know, cabal does not have a way to handle man pages. "make install" does install one, that git brings up when you run t

Re: git annex map does not spot graph loops

2011-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
Adam Spiers wrote: > I set up two git annex repos on the local machine which point to each > other and then run git annex map, it chews up a load of CPU, > presumably trying to traverse the cyclic repository graph without ever > noticing there's a loop: Fixed, it only happened when the repos refer

Re: New integration branch

2011-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
Adam Spiers wrote: > OK, as discussed, here's a new 'for-joey' branch based off > current upstream master: > > https://github.com/aspiers/kitenet-mr/commits/for-joey > > All commits are self-contained, and hopefully non-contentious. They > are mostly minor bugfixes, but there are a few enhance

Re: Lost Repository Was: Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-04 Thread Joey Hess
Klaus Ethgen wrote: > At the moment I am not absolutely sure of the bug or not. > > Lets make an example. > >> git annex status ... >---- -- Clone >> git annex drop file/name >drop file/name ok >> git annex status > And no Clone reposi

Re: Lost Repository Was: Removing git-annex Repo

2011-12-04 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Am So den 4. Dez 2011 um 22:17 schrieb Joey Hess: > It certianly looks like a bug. Ok. > I cannot even think of how it would be changing git-annex:uuid.log > when all you did is a drop, and particularly if there was no > auto-merge of another

Re: New integration branch

2011-12-04 Thread Adam Spiers
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Joey Hess wrote: > 37617a63ec993b128f77a945a2020ec894c58eb1 >        loadconfig already uses %loaded to avoid reloading the same >        config twice, so this extra check is not necessary, I think. Ah yes, I missed that. Still, for the cost of an extra line of co

alternative mechanisms for including config

2011-12-04 Thread Adam Spiers
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Adam Spiers wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Joey Hess wrote: >>        If a machine-parseable list of repositories is needed, >>        I think it'd be better to have a perl function that emits >>        it in one go. > > I don't see how that's possible w