On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 20:44, Vincent Demeester wrote:
>
>> That also sound useful for me, and somehow with a similar use case (my
>> photography folder).
>
> I just realized that a special git remote may make more sense than a
> special
Answering this one as I think this answers Sean's as well.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:21, Adam Spiers wrote:
> What would be "special" about such a remote?
Like other special git-annex remotes, it would not be a real git-annex
repo. Same as git-annex is able to use and track data in S3, bup,
HT
