Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-15 Thread Robie Basak
FTR, I answered most questions about "why not dgit?" in the thread I just moved to vcs-pkg-discuss only[1]. For some specific questions here: On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:31:31AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > dgit can work on Ubuntu too, in a readonly mode. (It would be nice to > make `dgit push'

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > > Ok, can you prepare a patch for DEP-14 then? I'll apply it as it looks like > > a reasonable extension. > > Attached. FYI I intend to implement this in dgit. T

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Ian Jackson
I forgot one: Ian Jackson writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > A patches-unapplied tree: > > * produces confusing and sometimes misleading output from >git grep, or (even if appropriate history is available) >with git blame; > > * canno

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 09.11.2016 [21:27:14 +], Ian Jackson wrote: > Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > > Ok, can you prepare a patch for DEP-14 then? I'll apply it as it looks like > > a reasonable extension. > > Attached. FYI I intend to impleme

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > Ok, can you prepare a patch for DEP-14 then? I'll apply it as it looks like > a reasonable extension. Attached. FYI I intend to implement this in dgit. Thanks, Ian. >From 5c63400e9be8cb1532515764a1179730aed550fb

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > > The reverse rule is to convert _ and % and delete all #. > > Quoted for completeness. Ok, can you prepare a patch for DEP-14 then? I'll apply it as it looks like a reasonable extension. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-08 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > > On Fri, 04 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > My proposal is reversible. It does not need to be extensible. > > > > So what abo

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > On Fri, 04 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > > My proposal is reversible. It does not need to be extensible. > > So what about "..."? Would it give ".#.#."? Yes. I said (fixing my bu

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 04 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > > We have defined simple "readable" mappings for the common cases that > > we encounter frequently. Now if we need mappings for silly things > > that w

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-03 Thread Ian Jackson
Nish Aravamudan writes ("DEP14 policy for two dots"): > [ Raphael, apologies for sending twice, had a error in the headers in > the prior one ] > > Not sure exactly where to ask this better than debian-devel, but I am > working on an importer for the Ubuntu Server team which parses published >