Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > > The reverse rule is to convert _ and % and delete all #. > > Quoted for completeness. Ok, can you prepare a patch for DEP-14 then? I'll apply it as it looks like a reasonable extension. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > On Tue, 08 Nov 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > The reverse rule is to convert _ and % and delete all #. > > > > Quoted for completeness. > > Ok, can you prepare a patch for DEP-14 then? I'll apply it as it looks like > a reasonable extens

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > Ok, can you prepare a patch for DEP-14 then? I'll apply it as it looks like > a reasonable extension. Attached. FYI I intend to implement this in dgit. Thanks, Ian. >From 5c63400e9be8cb1532515764a1179730aed550fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 09.11.2016 [21:27:14 +], Ian Jackson wrote: > Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > > Ok, can you prepare a patch for DEP-14 then? I'll apply it as it looks like > > a reasonable extension. > > Attached. FYI I intend to implement this in dgit. Thank you! We will foll

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Nish Aravamudan writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > Thank you! We will follow the same in the Ubuntu tooling used by the Server > Team. Great, thanks. Can I ask you a rather unrelated question ? AIUI you are working on importing Ubuntu's history into git. That's great. Can you confirm

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 09.11.2016 [23:38:30 +], Ian Jackson wrote: > Nish Aravamudan writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > > Thank you! We will follow the same in the Ubuntu tooling used by the Server > > Team. > > Great, thanks. > > Can I ask you a rather unrelated question ? AIUI you are working on > im

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Nish Aravamudan writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > On 09.11.2016 [23:38:30 +], Ian Jackson wrote: > > Can you confirm what approach you have taken to the representation of > > Debian source packges as git trees ? I would like to encourage you to > > use a representation which is compa

Re: DEP14 policy for two dots

2016-11-09 Thread Ian Jackson
I forgot one: Ian Jackson writes ("Re: DEP14 policy for two dots"): > A patches-unapplied tree: > > * produces confusing and sometimes misleading output from >git grep, or (even if appropriate history is available) >with git blame; > > * cannot be used with `git cherry pick '; > > *