[vde-users] using wirefilter programmatically

2014-01-10 Thread Marco Giusti
Hello, I'm using wirefilter programmatically and I incurred an undesired behavior: some times the commands are not send one after the other but are chained together and then they are sent but wirefilter is not able to handle this situation. ex: bandwidth LR 12\n bandwidth RL 1

[vde-users] wirefilter does not handle --nofifo switch

2014-01-10 Thread Marco Giusti
Good morning, the wirefilter's man page and the help report the -N switch but it is not handled in the code. Where is the bug in the man page or in the code? PS. Please CC to me because I'm not subscribed to the list. Marco ---

Re: [vde-users] wirefilter does not handle --nofifo switch

2014-01-10 Thread Renzo Davoli
The bug is in the code. The feature is working provided the extended option is used --nofifo instead of -N. I forgot to add an N in getopt's optstring. I'll fix the bug asap. Please use the long option workaround in the meanwhile. renzo davoli On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:27:44AM +0100,

[vde-users] SF.net SVN: vde:[565] trunk/vde-2/src/wirefilter.c

2014-01-10 Thread rd235
Revision: 565 http://sourceforge.net/p/vde/svn/565 Author: rd235 Date: 2014-01-10 15:04:08 + (Fri, 10 Jan 2014) Log Message: --- wirefilter -N missing in getopt's optstring Modified Paths: -- trunk/vde-2/src/wirefilter.c Modified: trunk/vde-2/src/wirefi

[vde-users] SF.net SVN: vde:[566] branches/rd235/vde-2/src/wirefilter.c

2014-01-10 Thread rd235
Revision: 566 http://sourceforge.net/p/vde/svn/566 Author: rd235 Date: 2014-01-10 15:05:41 + (Fri, 10 Jan 2014) Log Message: --- Wirefilter: -N was missing in getopt's optstring Modified Paths: -- branches/rd235/vde-2/src/wirefilter.c Modified: branches