Re: [vdr] VDR 1.7.0 + xine plugin 0.8.2 - seve ral issues

2008-04-28 Thread Igor
But if I disconnect from the card the antenna I will have this problem [snip] let's see in the xine output [snip] video_out: throwing away image with pts 96108366 because it's too old (diff : 434402). video_out: throwing away image with pts 96111366 because it's too old (diff :

[vdr] vdr HD MPEG-4 DVB-C

2008-04-28 Thread Simon Baxter
Has anyone tried one of these new cards with VDR? http://www.dvbshop.net/product_info.php/info/p149_SATELCO-EasyWatch-PCI-DVB-C-HDTV--Basic-Edition-.html Or any other DVB-C card supporting CI/CAM and MPEG-4 ?___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] vdr HD MPEG-4 DVB-C

2008-04-28 Thread Petri Helin
Simon Baxter wrote: Has anyone tried one of these new cards with VDR? http://www.dvbshop.net/product_info.php/info/p149_SATELCO-EasyWatch-PCI-DVB-C-HDTV--Basic-Edition-.html Or any other DVB-C card supporting CI/CAM and MPEG-4 ? The support for MPEG-4 comes in the form of codecs

Re: [vdr] vdr HD MPEG-4 DVB-C

2008-04-28 Thread Heikki Manninen
Petri Helin wrote: Simon Baxter wrote: Has anyone tried one of these new cards with VDR? http://www.dvbshop.net/product_info.php/info/p149_SATELCO-EasyWatch-PCI-DVB-C-HDTV--Basic-Edition-.html Or any other DVB-C card supporting CI/CAM and MPEG-4 ? The support for MPEG-4 comes in the

Re: [vdr] vdr HD MPEG-4 DVB-C

2008-04-28 Thread Lars Bläser
Simon Baxter wrote: Has anyone tried one of these new cards with VDR? http://www.dvbshop.net/product_info.php/info/p149_SATELCO-EasyWatch-PCI-DVB-C-HDTV--Basic-Edition-.html Or any other DVB-C card supporting CI/CAM and MPEG-4 ? mpeg4 is only a software thing, there is no h264 ff-card i

Re: [vdr] VDR 1.7.0 ERROR (dvbdevice.c,302): Invalid argument

2008-04-28 Thread Gregoire Favre
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:29:26AM +0400, Igor wrote: Hi when I want to switch on dvb-s2 channel ASTRA HD+;BetaDigital:11914:hC910I1M2O35S1:S19.2E:27500:1279:0;1283=deu:0:0:131:133:6:0 Well, I have this : ASTRA

[vdr] transponder moving

2008-04-28 Thread Rainer Zocholl
ARD swaps transponder 2nd June. With VDR that seems to be difficult? Exsample: ARD is now at say Channel 5 the new ARD Channels are detected at Channel 1200 ff... VDR allows to mark Channel 1200 and move it 1204 lines back wards via cursor. (Channel table does no wrapp, there are 1700 channel

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE]: osdpip-0.0.9

2008-04-28 Thread Andreas Regel
Hi, there is a new version of the osdpip plugin available: http://home.arcor.de/andreas.regel/files/vdr-osdpip-0.0.9.tgz Changes since 0.0.8: - dropped support for VDR version older than 1.3.47. - Now using palette replacemen introduced in VDR 1.3.27, so palette setting workaround is not

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE]: osdpip-0.0.9

2008-04-28 Thread Anssi Hannula
Andreas Regel wrote: Hi, there is a new version of the osdpip plugin available: http://home.arcor.de/andreas.regel/files/vdr-osdpip-0.0.9.tgz Thanks. BTW, the Latest version available at in README has not been changed and points to the original site, that still has 0.0.8. -- Anssi Hannula

Re: [vdr] VDR 1.7.0 ERROR (dvbdevice.c,302): Invalid argument

2008-04-28 Thread Igor
Gregoire have you the same dvbdevice.c as me ? when I want to switch on dvb-s2 channel ASTRA HD+;BetaDigital:11914:hC910I1M2O35S1:S19.2E:27500:1279:0;1283=deu:0:0:131:133:6:0 Well, I have this : ASTRA HD+;BetaDigital:11914:hC910M2O35S1:S19.2E:27500:1279:0;1283=deu:0:0:131:133:6:0

[vdr] [ANNOUNCE]: powermate-0.0.4

2008-04-28 Thread Andreas Regel
Hi, there is a new version of the powermate plugin available: http://home.arcor.de/andreas.regel/files/powermate/vdr-powermate-0.0.4.tgz Changes since 0.0.3: - added support for VDR 1.4 and 1.6 (older versions might work, too) - support APIVERSION introduced with vdr 1.3.47 - replaced uint64

Re: [vdr] VDR 1.7.0 ERROR (dvbdevice.c,302): Invalid argument

2008-04-28 Thread Gregoire Favre
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:19:44PM +0400, Igor wrote: Gregoire have you the same dvbdevice.c as me ? md5sum /usr/src/vdr-1.7.0/dvbdevice.c 18981c81c4da6bb303b71b21147f3726 /usr/src/vdr-1.7.0/dvbdevice.c No idea... just md5sum your's. the difference is only in Inversion parameter. But