I running vdr streamdev for years now. First with 2* t\t 1500 ci
(default dvb) and now with 2* tt 3200ci (multiproto). Only some
judder and I think it?s a remux problem. For the Windows clients (my
self and the children) you can use vdr zapper (choose TS transport in
application
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
So what is the problem?
I want to use a TV and I would like to have a OSD. I like the OSD of
VDR, but there is only one. I would like to have one VDR-Server and two
or more Clients which can use OSD, program timer and view recordings. I
still not found a
Hi,
Udo Richter wrote:
Pasi Juppo wrote:
Would this approach allow easier implementation of a real client-server
solution for VDR or would VDR still need severe changes in order to
allow this?
Has not much to do with this. The limitation for a client-server
solution is that VDR has exact
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Oliver Joa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would this approach allow easier implementation of a real client-server
solution for VDR or would VDR still need severe changes in order to
allow this?
Has not much to do with this. The limitation for a client-server
VDR User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea of adding the DVB support in form of plugins instead of
including it in the core code? Before I left on vacation there was
some talk about how this is a better solution these days but not sure
if anything ever came out of that...?
i brought up this
On 26.10.2008 10:00, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
VDR User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea of adding the DVB support in form of plugins instead of
including it in the core code? Before I left on vacation there was
some talk about how this is a better solution these days but not sure
if
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
Well, I like the idea of taking the plain VDR and a FF DVB card
and have it run out of the box, without having to fiddle around
with any plugins ;-)
This is not really a good point any more, since at least latest
development 1.7.x builds wont work without a custom
It sounds like there are some really strong points in favor of using a
plugin instead. It would be great to hear more input on this! I
don't see any real immediate drawbacks to switching over, are there
any?
Cheers
___
vdr mailing list
Would this approach allow easier implementation of a real client-server
solution for VDR or would VDR still need severe changes in order to
allow this?
Br,
Pasi
VDR User wrote:
It sounds like there are some really strong points in favor of using a
plugin instead. It would be great to hear
Pasi Juppo wrote:
Would this approach allow easier implementation of a real client-server
solution for VDR or would VDR still need severe changes in order to
allow this?
Has not much to do with this. The limitation for a client-server
solution is that VDR has exact ONE display front end, ONE
The idea of adding the DVB support in form of plugins instead of
including it in the core code? Before I left on vacation there was
some talk about how this is a better solution these days but not sure
if anything ever came out of that...?
Thanks.
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
