Re: [vdr] Regression from a fix in VDR 1.4.1: Needless blocking of CAM DVB cards

2008-12-21 Thread Jörn Reder
Udo Richter wrote: > I've attached a debug patch for impact logging. It dumps the reasons why > VDR used a certain device to the console. (replace printf with isyslog > if you prefer the log files.) > [...] Thanks for this patch, but I don't know when I can test it. I downgraded my production v

Re: [vdr] Regression from a fix in VDR 1.4.1: Needless blocking of CAM DVB cards

2008-12-21 Thread Udo Richter
On 01.12.2008 16:02, Jörn Reder wrote: Jörn Reder wrote: With vdr 1.4 this worked perfectly, now with 1.6 VDR always prefers my Budget CI card for recordings so I can't view any Pay TV when a recording is active. The rules that were added with 1.4.1-4 are still present, so they probably got ove

Re: [vdr] Regression from a fix in VDR 1.4.1: Needless blocking of CAM DVB cards

2008-12-01 Thread Jörn Reder
Udo Richter wrote: > Jörn Reder wrote: > > With vdr 1.4 this worked perfectly, now with 1.6 VDR always prefers my > > Budget CI card for recordings so I can't view any Pay TV when a > > recording is active. > > The rules that were added with 1.4.1-4 are still present, so they > probably got ov

Re: [vdr] Regression from a fix in VDR 1.4.1: Needless blocking of CAM DVB cards

2008-11-30 Thread Udo Richter
Jörn Reder wrote: > With vdr 1.4 this worked perfectly, now with 1.6 VDR always prefers my > Budget CI card for recordings so I can't view any Pay TV when a > recording is active. The rules that were added with 1.4.1-4 are still present, so they probably got over-ruled by something else. Can y

[vdr] Regression from a fix in VDR 1.4.1: Needless blocking of CAM DVB cards

2008-11-30 Thread Jörn Reder
Hiho, I recently upgraded to VDR from 1.4 to 1.6.0 and sadly there is a regression from a bug which was fixed in VDR 1.4.1. The problem is described (with patches) in this thread: http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2006-August/010312.html The changelog entry of the fix: 2006-08-13: Versi