Re: [vdr] Suggestion (patch) for sections.c

2013-02-09 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 08.02.2013 14:52, Teemu Suikki wrote: Hi! As I mentioned in my previous email, I'm using diseqc.conf to drive my motorized dish. I noticed that sometimes VDR generates false channe updates, when the dish is moving. The problem is, channel switches immediately, but it takes seconds for

Re: [vdr] Suggestion (patch) for sections.c

2013-02-09 Thread Teemu Suikki
Klaus, This has no effect on channel switching time. Channel switch is instant. Patch only delays the scanning of pids, epg data, new transponders etc. Of course if the pids have changed since the last time this channel was tuned, it will use the old values for the first 10 seconds.. but I don't

Re: [vdr] Suggestion (patch) for sections.c

2013-02-09 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 09.02.2013 12:03, Teemu Suikki wrote: Klaus, This has no effect on channel switching time. Channel switch is instant. Patch only delays the scanning of pids, epg data, new transponders etc. Of course if the pids have changed since the last time this channel was tuned, it will use the old

[vdr] Suggestion (patch) for sections.c

2013-02-08 Thread Teemu Suikki
Hi! As I mentioned in my previous email, I'm using diseqc.conf to drive my motorized dish. I noticed that sometimes VDR generates false channe updates, when the dish is moving. The problem is, channel switches immediately, but it takes seconds for the dish to move. Often there is several seconds