Hi,
I tried several vdr versions, but they all share the same problem on my Ubuntu
(currentyl 6.06) box: vdr starts very slowly when the syslog daemon is
running. The vdr bootup takes about 1-2 minutes with syslog running. After
stopping the syslogd vdr starts in about 10 seconds and responds
I demand that Stone may or may not have written...
There is a fixed patchset here:
URL:http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/patches/vdr-xine/
Darren, should all of these patches in your vdr-xine directory be applied
to current xine development? Thanks for the patches.
Eventually. I
I demand that Klaus Schmidinger may or may not have written...
[snip]
Oh, while we're at it: you're apparently selling stuff over your web site
at http://www.dalibox.de, as can be seen on
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Anssi Hannula wrote:
I used the following command to scan Astra19.2:
scan -o vdr -e 4 -s 1 -v
/usr/share/doc/dvb-utils/examples/scan/dvb-s/Astra-19.2E 19.2-scan.txt
I use something like -x so that the scan doesn't force ca field to
1, which has non-desired effect
e9hack wrote:
after applying the patch, I get many entries (30 per second) in the syslog:
Aug 6 23:20:23 very-new-darkstar vdr: [11415] ERROR (svdrp.c,84): Address
already in use
The svdrp server port (default 2001) is in use by another program, in
other words, there's another VDR instance
Hi Chris,
Chris Elsworth wrote:
Yes, I read the old mails and found the hue of 0 or 100 suggestion,
and tried it (see original mail I posted) and it didn't work. I just
tried it again with softdevice from cvs to double check and it didn't
have any effect, so maybe I'm running into a slightly
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 06:45:55PM -0700, CR wrote:
Hi Chris,
Chris Elsworth wrote:
Yes, I read the old mails and found the hue of 0 or 100 suggestion,
and tried it (see original mail I posted) and it didn't work. I just
tried it again with softdevice from cvs to double check and it
